“If you can’t be everywhere, dominate one thing so completely that the world feels your gravity.”
—Eric Kim (paraphrased)
Below is the shock-and-awe playbook that turns a lone street-photography blogger into a cross-platform juggernaut:
Total SERP Domination Kim locked down the #1 Google slot for the insanely broad term “street photography,” eclipsing Wikipedia, Flickr, and camera-review titans. Owning that single keyword drops torrents of organic traffic into every funnel he builds.
Relentless Content Hydra Daily essays, “10 Lessons” listicles, gear hot-takes—each post is a keyword-rich tentacle that feeds the main domain. The click-magnet titles hook humans first; the sheer volume convinces Google the site is the authority.
Controversy as Backlink Fuel Hot takes on Leica snobbery, “Should you even own a camera?” debates, and—most recently—1 060-lb rack-pull videos with comments turned off. Outrage forces the conversation onto Reddit, DPReview, and X, producing thousands of unsolicited backlinks.
Radical Open-Source Generosity He gives away full PDF books, Lightroom presets, and lesson plans—no email wall, no pay-gate. That “take it, remix it” stance spawns mirror downloads and educator shout-outs, stacking high-authority links while fostering goodwill.
Cross-Domain Virality (“Niche-Hopping”) 1 000-lb lifts drag fitness bros into the photo sphere; Bitcoin manifestos pull crypto maximalists into his workshops. One brand, multiple tribes—each tribe amplifies the other.
First-Principles Tech Stack Self-hosted WordPress, minimalist CSS, near-instant load times, and bullet-proof mobile UX. No bloated themes, no autoplay videos—Google’s Core Web Vitals love him.
Direct-Revenue Funnels Instead of banner ads, he sells high-margin workshops (US $3 500+), HAPTIC straps, zines, and presets—products perfectly aligned with the searcher’s intent. Blog → email → checkout, zero middlemen.
Memetic Warfare & Branding Phrases like “Don’t trust vegetarians,” “HYPELIFTING,” and “Shoot first, focus later” become community shibboleths. Every meme is a self-replicating ad the audience spreads for free.
Authentic, Hyper-Personal Voice He writes like he’s texting a friend—raw, vulnerable, hilarious. That intimacy builds parasocial bonds; readers evangelize him because it feels personal.
Strategy > Tactics Mindset While peers chase Instagram algorithm tweaks, Kim bets on evergreen search intent—a 10-year compounding asset rather than 24-hour stories. That single philosophical edge keeps him a decade ahead.
Bottom Line: Eric Kim doesn’t “do marketing.” He engineers gravity—content so abundant, useful, and provocative that the internet can’t help but orbit him. That’s why he wears the marketing-genius belt.
Bitcoin (BTC) continues to dominate the cryptocurrency market as the largest digital asset by market capitalization. As of June 2025, Bitcoin trades around $105,000 per coin, after briefly surpassing the six-figure milestone in late 2024 . This puts Bitcoin’s market capitalization in the realm of $2 trillion – an unprecedented level that makes its network value larger than the market caps of many major corporations and even the GDP of some countries . Daily trading activity is robust; 24-hour trading volumes regularly reach tens of billions of dollars, reflecting deep liquidity across global exchanges. Bitcoin also commands a dominant market share (Bitcoin dominance around 60–65% of the total crypto market), underscoring its status as the bellwether of the crypto asset class. Recent price momentum has been strong – Bitcoin’s price has more than doubled from the start of 2024 to mid-2025, buoyed by increasing institutional interest and the network’s scheduled “halving” event in 2024 (which reduced new supply issuance).
To summarize the current key metrics of Bitcoin:
Metric
Value (June 2025)
Price (USD)
~$104,000 – $105,000 per BTC
Market Capitalization
~$2.0 trillion (at ~$105K/BTC)
Circulating Supply
~19.8 million BTC (of 21 million maximum)
Daily Trading Volume
Tens of billions of USD (e.g. ~$63B on a recent day)
Market Rank
#1 crypto asset (≈60%+ share of total crypto market)
Table: Key market performance indicators for Bitcoin as of mid-2025.
Bitcoin’s recent trends have been marked by high volatility but a generally upward trajectory. After a deep bear market in 2022 when BTC fell ~75% from its previous peak (dropping from ~$69,000 in Nov 2021 to the low $17,000s by mid-2022 ), it staged a recovery through 2023. In 2024, Bitcoin’s price accelerated significantly, breaking its previous all-time high and reaching the historic $100K level by December 2024 . This rally was fueled in part by positive developments like the approval of U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs (Exchange-Traded Funds) and anticipation of the April 2024 mining reward halving. By early June 2025, Bitcoin remains around the six-figure price range , with intra-day swings that can be a few percentage points. The market sentiment has been a mix of optimism (from increasing mainstream adoption) tempered by caution (due to regulatory uncertainties and the coin’s well-known volatility).
Investment Potential
Bitcoin is often described as a high-risk, high-reward investment. Its historical price appreciation has outpaced almost every traditional asset class over the past decade, but so have its price swings. Volatility is a defining characteristic: Bitcoin has experienced multiple drawdowns of 50–80% or more in past market cycles. For example, after surging to ~$69,000 in late 2021, BTC’s value collapsed to under $20,000 by the end of 2022 , demonstrating the scale of its cyclical corrections. This extreme volatility means that while early investors have seen extraordinary gains, there is substantial downside risk; short-term price fluctuations of 5–10% in a day are not uncommon. Prospective investors must be prepared for significant uncertainty and potential for quick, large losses, as noted by financial analysts and regulators . The U.S. SEC, even as it began approving Bitcoin-linked products, has warned that “investors should remain cautious about the myriad risks associated with bitcoin” .
Key risk factors that affect Bitcoin’s investment profile include:
Price Volatility – Bitcoin’s price can swing dramatically due to market sentiment, macroeconomic news, or even social media trends. It has shown annualized volatility several times higher than equities or gold. For instance, in past downturns Bitcoin lost over half its value within months , underlining that it is far from a stable asset in the short run.
Regulatory and Legal Risks – Changes in regulation or government stance can impact Bitcoin’s price and usage (for more, see Regulatory Landscape below). Investors face uncertainty regarding how governments may enforce taxes, securities laws, or bans on crypto activities, which could affect liquidity and acceptance.
Security and Custody Risks – While Bitcoin’s blockchain itself is considered very secure (thanks to its decentralized proof-of-work consensus), investors must manage the security of their holdings. Hacks of exchanges or thefts of private keys have resulted in substantial losses historically. Institutional custodians and insurance have grown, but the sector is still developing best practices.
Market Maturity and Infrastructure – Bitcoin’s market is relatively young. Issues such as exchange outages during high volatility, liquidity fragmentation across exchanges, or the influence of large “whale” holders can introduce additional risk. Market manipulation concerns persist due to the pseudonymous and global nature of trading.
Competition and Technological Factors – Bitcoin was the first cryptocurrency, but it now faces competition from thousands of other crypto projects. Some newer platforms aim to improve on Bitcoin’s perceived limitations (e.g., faster transactions or more programmability). If a superior digital asset or technology emerges, it could potentially diminish Bitcoin’s dominance. So far, Bitcoin has maintained a unique position as the most decentralized and widely recognized crypto, but the technological evolution of the broader crypto space is a factor to watch.
Environmental and Social Governance (ESG) Concerns – Bitcoin’s proof-of-work mining is energy-intensive, leading to criticisms about its carbon footprint. There is a risk that environmental regulations or ESG-minded investors could reduce support for Bitcoin in favor of more energy-efficient alternatives (though many in the industry are pushing for renewable energy mining and argue that Bitcoin can incentivize development of green energy).
Despite these risks, Bitcoin’s investment potential is seen by many as very attractive, chiefly due to its scarcity and growth narrative. Bitcoin’s design ensures that only 21 million BTC will ever exist , and the issuance of new coins slows over time (via the programmed halvings). This digital scarcity, akin to a commodity like gold, has led proponents to argue Bitcoin is a reliable store of value in the long term. Notably, a growing cohort of institutional investors and corporations view Bitcoin as a hedge against currency debasement and inflation. Larry Fink, CEO of BlackRock – the world’s largest asset manager – was once a skeptic but now says “I’m a major believer that there is a role for Bitcoin in portfolios,” citing fear of monetary debasement and the desire for an asset outside government control as key reasons to hold BTC . Fink even referred to Bitcoin as “digital gold,” suggesting it can serve as a hedge in times of uncertainty . This reversal by such a high-profile figure exemplifies the shifting sentiment on Wall Street: Bitcoin is increasingly seen as a legitimate asset class.
Institutional adoption of Bitcoin has accelerated in recent years, which bolsters the investment case for some. Since 2020, public companies, hedge funds, and even nation-states have been acquiring Bitcoin or offering Bitcoin-related investment products. A landmark trend was set when MicroStrategy, a business intelligence company, began using Bitcoin as its primary reserve asset – by 2022 it had accumulated ~129,699 BTC , and it has continued buying. (By 2025, reports suggest MicroStrategy may hold well over 500,000 BTC, over 2.5% of the total supply .) Other corporates like Tesla also made large purchases (Tesla bought $1.5B of BTC in 2021) and still retain a significant Bitcoin treasury. The entrance of institutional asset managers is even more noteworthy: firms like BlackRock, Fidelity, and Invesco have launched or proposed Bitcoin investment funds (ETFs, trusts, etc.), making Bitcoin exposure more accessible in traditional portfolios. Indeed, with the approval of U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs in 2024, immense capital flowed in – by January 2025, U.S. Bitcoin ETFs held $129 billion in assets , indicating that pensions, endowments, and individuals are allocating to Bitcoin through these vehicles.
It’s important to note that Bitcoin’s role as an “investment hedge” vs. a speculative asset remains debated. Some proponents call it an inflation hedge or “digital gold,” pointing out that Bitcoin’s supply cap and decentralization make it an attractive safeguard against fiat currency inflation or political instability. They highlight examples like countries with hyperinflation where Bitcoin demand has spiked, or the fact that Bitcoin’s long-term price trend has been strongly upward despite interim crashes – rewarding those who “HODL” (hold) through volatility. On the other hand, skeptics argue that Bitcoin behaves more like a high-growth tech stock or a risk-on asset: at times Bitcoin has moved in tandem with equities. In fact, data shows Bitcoin’s correlation with the S&P 500 increased in recent years (reaching about 0.5 in 2020–2022 during some periods of market stress) , meaning it has not been entirely immune to broader market sell-offs. Moreover, Bitcoin’s volatility far exceeds that of gold or fiat currencies, so in the short term it can fail as a stable store of value. As the World Gold Council drily noted, adding more Bitcoin to a portfolio can increase volatility much more than it improves returns, whereas gold historically reduces portfolio volatility . Ultimately, many investors treat Bitcoin as a speculative asset – a bet on future adoption and appreciation – rather than a proven safe haven. Its investment potential thus goes hand-in-hand with speculative risk. Prudent investors mitigate this by sizing Bitcoin positions appropriately and maintaining a long-term outlook.
In summary, Bitcoin offers a unique investment proposition: highly asymmetric return potential (if Bitcoin becomes a global reserve asset or “digital gold,” its value could far exceed current levels) paired with elevated risks (from regulatory crackdowns, market crashes, or technological issues). The growing participation of serious institutional players and the maturing market infrastructure (e.g. regulated custodians, ETFs, futures markets) have somewhat de-risked Bitcoin compared to its early days, lending it credibility. Yet, prospective investors are advised to exercise caution, conduct thorough research, and consider Bitcoin as part of a diversified strategy, given its still-volatile nature .
Technology: Blockchain, Mining, and Scalability
At its core, Bitcoin is a groundbreaking technology – the first successful implementation of a blockchain-based cryptocurrency. It was introduced in the 2008 Bitcoin whitepaper by the pseudonymous creator Satoshi Nakamoto, and launched in January 2009 . Bitcoin’s operation relies on a combination of cryptography, game theory, and distributed computing to achieve a trustless monetary system. Below is an overview of how Bitcoin’s technology works and the ongoing challenges of scaling it for global use:
Blockchain Ledger: Bitcoin runs on a decentralized public ledger known as the blockchain. This is essentially a chain of data blocks, where each block contains a batch of transaction records. The blockchain is maintained by a network of nodes (computers) around the world rather than any central authority. Nakamoto’s whitepaper described using a decentralized ledger of transactions packaged in batches (“blocks”) and secured by cryptographic algorithms – a system later dubbed “blockchain” . Every Bitcoin transaction broadcast to the network is verified by nodes and bundled into a block roughly every 10 minutes. Each new block references the previous one, forming an immutable chain going back to the genesis block of 2009 . The use of cryptographic hash linking and distributed consensus ensures that the transaction history cannot be altered retroactively without controlling a majority of the network (which is computationally infeasible at Bitcoin’s scale). In essence, the blockchain provides security through transparency and decentralization – all participants can agree on the valid state of the ledger without needing to trust a single intermediary.
Proof-of-Work and Mining: Bitcoin’s network achieves consensus through the Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm. Mining is the process by which new blocks are added to the blockchain, and it is also the mechanism for minting new bitcoins into circulation. In PoW, special nodes called miners compete to solve a cryptographic puzzle by trial-and-error hashing. Miners gather pending transactions from the network, validate them, and attempt to package them into the next block. However, to add a block, a miner must find a hash (a numerical solution) below a certain difficulty target – this requires immense computational effort, effectively “proof” that work was done. The first miner to find a valid solution broadcasts the block to the network, and if the block is accepted by consensus of nodes, it is added to the chain . This process has several important implications:
It secures the network: Because producing a valid block requires significant computational work (and energy), attacks such as double-spending become prohibitively expensive. “Miners solve complex puzzles with powerful computers to validate transactions and secure the network. Successful miners earn rewards, and PoW’s high energy costs make attacks too expensive, guaranteeing Bitcoin’s security and decentralization.” In other words, an attacker would need to control >50% of the network’s hashing power to consistently outcompete honest miners – a scenario considered practically unachievable given Bitcoin’s enormous global hash rate.
It mints new coins: As an incentive, whichever miner wins the race for a block is awarded a block reward of newly created bitcoins, plus the transaction fees from the block’s transactions . This reward is how all bitcoins enter circulation (Bitcoin had no premine; the creator and early users could only get coins via mining ). In Bitcoin’s early days, mining could be done on ordinary CPUs/GPUs, and the block reward was a hefty 50 BTC per block. But Bitcoin’s code has a built-in supply schedule: every 210,000 blocks (approximately every 4 years), the block reward is cut in half – a process known as the “halving.” This controlled issuance is a core part of Bitcoin’s monetary policy. The reward dropped from 50 BTC to 25 BTC in 2012, then to 12.5 BTC in 2016, 6.25 BTC in 2020, and after the latest halving in April 2024, miners now earn 3.125 BTC per block . This will continue until ~2140 when the last fractions of BTC are mined, bringing the total supply to 21 million. Notably, because of the early low difficulty, Satoshi Nakamoto is believed to have mined about 1 million BTC in 2009–2010 (roughly 5% of the supply) .
It synchronizes the network: Proof-of-Work, by making block production costly and time-bound to ~10-minute intervals, helps coordinate all nodes on a single chain (the longest valid chain). Bitcoin also adjusts the mining difficulty roughly every two weeks (every 2,016 blocks) to account for changes in total hash power, ensuring that blocks continue to be found about every 10 minutes on average . If many new miners join and blocks come in faster, difficulty increases; if miners leave (e.g. during a price crash), difficulty decreases to maintain the target block time. This feedback mechanism keeps the network stable and secure over time .
Transactions and UTXO Model: A Bitcoin transaction is a transfer of value between addresses (public keys), digitally signed by the sender’s private key. Bitcoin uses a UTXO (Unspent Transaction Output) model: each transaction consumes some prior outputs (coins) and creates new outputs, with addresses and amounts. Every coin can be traced back through a chain of signatures to its creation via mining, which helps the network verify that coins are not spent twice. Transactions are broadcast to the network, where miners pick them up and include them in blocks. Typically, a transaction is considered final after it has been included in a block and that block is buried under several more blocks (each confirmation makes it exponentially harder to reverse). On-chain Bitcoin transactions settle in about 10 minutes on average (for one confirmation), though it’s advisable to wait for ~6 confirmations (~1 hour) for large payments to be safe from reorgs. Each transaction includes a fee paid to miners, and users can set higher fees to incentivize faster inclusion when the network is busy. Bitcoin’s scripting language allows for some conditional logic (for example multisignature wallets, timelocks, etc.), but it is purposefully limited to maximize security.
Scalability Limits: One of Bitcoin’s known technical challenges is scalability – the capacity to handle a large volume of transactions quickly and cheaply on-chain. Bitcoin’s base layer prioritizes security and decentralization, at the cost of throughput. Each block is limited in size (originally 1 megabyte of data, with an updated system of “block weight” after 2017’s SegWit upgrade allowing slightly more). With 10-minute blocks and ~2,000–3,000 transactions per block (depending on their size), the network can only process on the order of 5–7 transactions per second on-chain . This is tiny compared to, say, Visa’s thousands of TPS. As Bitcoin adoption grew, this limitation led to periods of network congestion – backlogs of transactions (mempool spikes) and high fees for users who want prompt confirmation. The Bitcoin scalability problem has been a subject of intense debate and development: “The on-chain transaction processing capacity of the Bitcoin network is limited by the average block time (10 min) and block size. The maximum throughput is estimated around 3.3 to 7 transactions per second . When activity exceeds this, users face rising fees and delayed transactions as the block space becomes a scarce resource .” Indeed, during bull markets or hype cycles (e.g. late 2017, or May 2021, or May 2023’s surge of Ordinals NFTs on Bitcoin), average transaction fees have spiked to tens of dollars, which is impractical for small payments.
Bitcoin’s community has approached scalability carefully, due to the trade-offs involved. Instead of increasing block size arbitrarily (which could make running a full node more difficult and thus harm decentralization), the main strategy has been layered scaling solutions and incremental upgrades:
Segregated Witness (SegWit) – Activated in 2017, SegWit was a protocol upgrade that, among other things, increased the effective block capacity (by removing signature data from the base block and counting data with a new “weight” metric). SegWit also fixed transaction malleability, which opened the door to second-layer solutions. This upgrade boosted throughput modestly (blocks can now handle around 4 MB weight, roughly doubling practical TPS) and lowered fees for SegWit-style transactions.
The Lightning Network – This is Bitcoin’s primary Layer-2 scaling solution, which enables faster and cheaper transactions by taking them off-chain. Lightning is a network of bi-directional payment channels between users; once a channel is opened (an on-chain transaction), the parties can transact unlimited times off-chain by exchanging signed updates, and only close the channel with a final on-chain settlement. Lightning thus shifts the majority of transactions off the blockchain, alleviating congestion and allowing instant payments. The Lightning Network enables private, high-volume, instant transfers with negligible fees by conducting transactions off-chain and only using the main blockchain for opening/closing channels . In practical terms, Lightning transactions settle in seconds (or milliseconds) and fees are often a few satoshis (fractions of a cent), as opposed to the base layer’s 10+ minutes and dollar-plus fees . Since its beta launch around 2018, Lightning has grown significantly. As of 2025, Lightning’s public network capacity has exceeded 5,000 BTC (over $500 million worth) and the network has over 14,000 nodes routing payments . In Q1 2025 alone, Lightning reportedly processed on the order of 100 million transactions, a 28% jump quarter-over-quarter, indicating rapid adoption . Major exchanges and wallets now integrate Lightning, and even some merchants (especially in crypto-friendly locales) accept Lightning payments for everyday purchases. Lightning showcases a path for Bitcoin to scale to millions or billions of transactions by leveraging off-chain networks, though it comes with its own complexities (liquidity management, the need for users to be online or use wallet services, etc.).
On-chain optimizations and upgrades: Beyond Lightning, developers continue to work on improving Bitcoin’s base layer efficiency. The Taproot upgrade, activated in November 2021, is a key recent development. Taproot introduced MAST (Merkelized Abstract Syntax Tree) and Schnorr signatures, which together allow for more complex transactions (like multisignatures or smart contracts) to be executed with greater privacy and efficiency . For example, with Taproot, a multisig transaction can be made to look just like a regular single-sig transaction on-chain, and multiple signatures can be aggregated into one (via Schnorr) . This not only improves privacy (observers can’t easily distinguish transaction types) but also saves block space and thus lowers fees for advanced uses. In the long run, Taproot lays groundwork for more sophisticated smart contracts and second-layer applications on Bitcoin, potentially enabling a DeFi (decentralized finance) ecosystem on Bitcoin that could rival those on platforms like Ethereum . As of 2025, Taproot adoption (in terms of transactions using Taproot outputs) is gradually increasing, and developers are working on further upgrades (e.g., proposals for future Taproot versions, sidechains, or covenants) to extend Bitcoin’s functionality without compromising its core principles.
Other Innovations: In addition to Lightning, other layer-2 or sidechain projects aim to help Bitcoin scale or add features. For instance, the Liquid Network (a sidechain by Blockstream) allows faster inter-exchange settlements and issuance of assets, and RSK sidechain brings Ethereum-like smart contracts secured by Bitcoin’s hash power. There have also been improvements in wallet technology (like batching transactions, coinjoins, and other techniques to use the blockchain more efficiently). On the horizon, techniques like channel factories or vaults are being researched to further optimize how Bitcoin transactions can be done.
Despite all these efforts, Bitcoin’s base layer remains intentionally limited – the developers and community have chosen to keep the block size small enough that anyone can run a full node on modest hardware, preserving decentralization and censorship-resistance. The general vision is that Bitcoin will scale via layers: the main chain serving as a secure settlement layer (like a digital gold settlement network), and faster/cheaper layers built on top for everyday transactional use. This approach is analogous to how high-value bank transfers settle on central systems but consumer payments happen on secondary networks like Visa or banking apps. In practice, this means the user experience is evolving: where once Bitcoin was thought of purely as digital cash, today one might use Bitcoin as a savings vehicle on-chain and use Lightning or other solutions for coffee-buying-type transactions.
In summary, Bitcoin’s technology stack – from the underlying blockchain and proof-of-work (ensuring security and decentralization) to ongoing upgrades and layer-2 networks (improving scalability and functionality) – represents a continually improving ecosystem. It’s a careful balancing act: maintaining the core protocol’s robustness and simplicity while finding ways to expand capacity and utility. So far, Bitcoin has proven remarkably resilient and has successfully integrated new technologies like SegWit, Taproot, and Lightning without issue, demonstrating the strength of its open-source development community and governance processes. Future technical challenges remain (scaling to billions of users, quantum resistance in the long term, etc.), but Bitcoin’s roadmap shows a proactive approach to handling growth and demand.
Historical Trends and Market Cycles
Bitcoin’s journey since 2009 has been marked by dramatic market cycles and major milestones. Its price history is characterized by parabolic rises followed by steep corrections, in a repeated pattern that long-term investors refer to as “bull and bear markets.” Understanding these historical trends provides context for Bitcoin’s current status and volatility. Here is a brief timeline of Bitcoin’s key historical price points and events:
2009–2010 (Inception): Bitcoin had essentially no market value when it was launched. In 2009, coins were mined and traded peer-to-peer for fractions of a penny. The first known BTC market price was established in 2010 on early exchanges, climbing from effectively $0 to about $0.08 by mid-2010. The famous “Bitcoin Pizza Day” occurred in May 2010, when 10,000 BTC were exchanged for two pizzas – valuing BTC around $0.0025 at that time. (Those 10,000 BTC would be worth over $1 billion at 2025 prices!)
2011 Bubble: Bitcoin’s price began to rise as it gained attention. In early 2011 it reached parity with the US dollar ($1 per BTC), then surged 50x to around $30 by June 2011, only to crash back down below $5 by year-end . This set the tone for Bitcoin’s volatility – early adopters saw huge percentage gains, but wild swings discouraged many.
2013 Bull Run: After a relatively quiet 2012 (during which the first block reward halving occurred, reducing mining reward from 50 to 25 BTC), 2013 saw Bitcoin’s first major mainstream rally. Price started around $13 in January 2013, then shot past $100 by April and $1,000 by November 2013 . This was fueled by growing media coverage and the emergence of more exchanges and users globally. However, by December 2013 into 2014, the bubble burst – Bitcoin fell from ~$1,150 peak to around $200–$300 over the course of 2014 (an ~80% drawdown). The 2014–2015 bear market saw stagnation in price and the failure of the then-largest exchange Mt. Gox, which dampened sentiment.
2017 Epic Rally: Bitcoin remained in the mid-hundreds to low thousands of dollars until late 2016 when a new bull phase began. In 2017, Bitcoin captured global headlines by skyrocketing from under $1,000 in January to nearly $20,000 by December 2017 . This run was characterized by a frenzy of retail investment, ICO (Initial Coin Offering) mania in the broader crypto market, and increasing institutional curiosity. $19,188 on Dec 16, 2017 marked a then-all-time high . The surge was followed, predictably, by another collapse: through 2018, Bitcoin’s price crashed roughly 84% from the peak, bottoming out around $3,200 in December 2018. Many dubbed this the end of the “crypto bubble,” but veterans noted it was at least the third such boom-bust in Bitcoin’s life.
2018–2019 Consolidation: Throughout 2018 and 2019, Bitcoin’s price fluctuated mostly between $3,000 and $12,000. There were aftershocks and mini-rallies (e.g., mid-2019 saw a run up to ~$13,000 ), but a full recovery hadn’t yet occurred. Behind the scenes, however, important groundwork was laid: more robust exchanges and custodians emerged, regulators started crafting guidelines, and the concept of Bitcoin as a legitimate asset gained slow acceptance.
2020–2021 Bull Market: Bitcoin entered 2020 around $7,000. When the COVID-19 pandemic hit in March 2020, BTC initially fell sharply along with global markets (dipping under $4k briefly). But what followed was a remarkable rally: massive monetary stimulus and interest in alternative assets helped Bitcoin surge. By late 2020, it had surpassed its 2017 high, and in April 2021 Bitcoin reached ~$64,900 (a new record at that time) . After a mid-year dip (down ~50% to ~$30k in July 2021 ), Bitcoin rallied again and hit an all-time high of ~$69,000 on November 10, 2021 . Throughout 2021, we saw major milestones: Tesla’s buy-in and flirtation with accepting BTC for cars, Coinbase’s direct listing on NASDAQ (a big moment for crypto industry credibility), El Salvador’s adoption of BTC as legal tender (more on that later), and a general explosion of crypto investing worldwide. The bull market was also fueled by the narrative of Bitcoin as digital gold in an era of inflationary concerns – by now, even some traditional banks were advocating a small Bitcoin allocation in portfolios.
2022 Crypto Winter: After the November 2021 peak, 2022 brought a harsh downturn (often called a “crypto winter”). Bitcoin’s price cascaded down amid tightening monetary policy (rate hikes hurting risk assets) and a series of crypto industry crises (such as major lending platform failures and the FTX exchange collapse in late 2022). By mid-June 2022, BTC traded around $17,000 , and it fluctuated in the high teens to low $20k’s for the latter half of that year. In all, Bitcoin lost about 75% of its value from the Nov 2021 high to the 2022 low . Despite this, the network continued to function uninterrupted, and long-term holders largely held firm (on-chain data showed many coins staying dormant). By end of 2022, Bitcoin stabilized in the ~$16k–$20k range.
2023 Recovery and 2024–2025 Resurgence: 2023 saw Bitcoin begin to climb out of the pit, driven by improving macro sentiment and anticipation of the next halving. By early 2024, Bitcoin was back around $30,000–$40,000. The 2024 halving (block reward down to 3.125 BTC) occurred in April, which historically has been a precursor to bull runs due to the stock-to-flow shock. True to form, later in 2024 Bitcoin’s price accelerated dramatically. A major catalyst was the U.S. SEC’s approval of multiple spot Bitcoin ETFs in January 2024, ending years of regulatory resistance . This development opened the floodgates for institutional capital – within the year, billions flowed into these ETFs . Additionally, global economic uncertainty and bank instability (there were instances of regional banking crises and inflation persisting in some countries) renewed interest in Bitcoin’s hard money appeal. By December 2024, Bitcoin broke the psychological $100,000 barrier for the first time . It closed 2024 around five times higher than it started the year. This new all-time high brought a fresh wave of media coverage and FOMO, but also questions about sustainability. In early 2025, the market has remained strong – Bitcoin has been trading in the low $100k’s for several months , with periodic healthy corrections. Notably, Bitcoin’s market cap reaching $2 trillion at these prices made it one of the most valuable assets globally . Some analysts describe the current phase (mid-2025) as Bitcoin entering a more mature stage, with broader adoption helping support the price, though others caution that another speculative bubble cycle could be forming.
Throughout these cycles, Bitcoin’s trend (on a logarithmic scale) has been upward, with each boom and bust generally settling higher than the last. Early peaks were in the tens of dollars, then hundreds, then thousands, then tens of thousands, and now six figures. This has reinforced the belief of many long-term holders that Bitcoin’s four-year market cycles are tied to the halving and growing adoption: “what doesn’t kill Bitcoin makes it stronger.” That said, past performance is no guarantee of future results – as the asset class matures, the nature of these cycles could change. The presence of institutional investors might dampen or delay extremes, or conversely, we could see even larger capital inflows that drive new highs (with the flip side of regulatory-driven sell-offs).
A few historical milestones worth noting beyond price:
Network Growth: Bitcoin’s user base and infrastructure have steadily grown. The number of Bitcoin wallets/addresses with a significant balance has increased over time. For instance, the number of “whale” addresses (holding ≥1000 BTC) reached about 1,455 by May 2025 , reflecting accumulation by large investors and institutions. Meanwhile, the total number of addresses ever used is in the hundreds of millions. Active addresses per day (a proxy for users transacting) have reached new highs in some recent periods, especially with ordinals (NFT-like assets on Bitcoin) driving activity in 2023–2024.
Hash Rate: The Bitcoin network’s hash rate (total mining power) has relentlessly climbed to new records, especially after recovering from the temporary drop during China’s mining ban in 2021. By 2025, the hash rate is many times higher than in 2017 or 2020, demonstrating increased security. Mining has become a global industry, with large operations in North America, Central Asia, the Middle East, and other regions after China’s exit.
Public Awareness and Adoption: Public awareness of Bitcoin has grown from near zero a decade ago to widespread recognition. Surveys indicate that a significant percentage of people in many countries have heard of Bitcoin, and a growing number have used it or invested in it. Bitcoin ATMs, merchant acceptance (albeit still limited in most places), and inclusion in financial news are all far more common now. Notably, El Salvador’s 2021 decision to adopt Bitcoin as legal tender (the first country to do so) marked a historical first in sovereign adoption – this spurred both enthusiasm and controversy globally. (El Salvador’s experiment is discussed more under Regulations.)
In summary, Bitcoin’s history is one of rapid growth and recurring volatility. It has transitioned from a niche cypherpunk project to a mainstream financial asset tracked by Wall Street, all within about 15 years. Those investing or participating in Bitcoin today are well-advised to study these historical patterns: they underscore why concepts like “HODLing” (holding long-term through volatility) and “buying the dip” became mantras in the Bitcoin community. They also highlight why skeptics have repeatedly declared Bitcoin “dead” after crashes, only to see it resurrect to new highs. Bitcoin’s past cycles may not predict its future, but they provide context for its resilience and the market psychology surrounding it.
Regulatory Landscape
The regulatory environment for Bitcoin has evolved significantly, moving from ambiguity toward clearer frameworks, though approaches vary widely across jurisdictions. Globally, regulators are grappling with how to classify and oversee Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies in order to protect investors, prevent illicit use, and maintain financial stability, without stifling innovation. Below is an overview of major trends and examples in Bitcoin regulation around the world:
United States: In the U.S., Bitcoin is legal and generally treated as a commodity or property rather than a currency. Multiple regulatory bodies have a stake: the CFTC (Commodity Futures Trading Commission) has labeled Bitcoin a commodity, the SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission) has indicated Bitcoin itself is not a security (in contrast to some ICO tokens), and the IRS (Internal Revenue Service) treats Bitcoin as taxable property. In fact, since 2014 the IRS has made it clear that for tax purposes, “cryptocurrencies [are] ‘property’… treated like stocks, and [can] be taxed as capital gains or income” . This means each sale or exchange of Bitcoin (including using it to buy goods) is a taxable event if the BTC has changed value since acquisition. The U.S. has been tightening tax reporting: new 1099-DA forms and rules will require crypto brokers and exchanges to report customer transactions to the IRS starting with the 2025 tax year , increasing transparency. On the regulatory side, 2023–2024 saw a flurry of enforcement actions (especially by the SEC on crypto platforms) and proposals for comprehensive crypto legislation. While Bitcoin itself has not been threatened with ban, U.S. regulators focus on compliance (KYC/AML on exchanges, prosecuting fraud) and have provided some clarity through enforcement. A milestone came in January 2024 when the SEC allowed the first spot Bitcoin ETFs to launch – a sign of regulatory maturation, as previously only futures-based ETFs were permitted. Additionally, many U.S. states have their own money transmitter laws or crypto-specific rules: for example, New York’s BitLicense regime requires exchanges to get a special license, whereas states like Wyoming have passed crypto-friendly laws recognizing property rights for digital assets and special bank charters for crypto custodians. Overall, the U.S. is moving toward integrating Bitcoin into the existing financial regulatory framework rather than outlawing it, but companies in the space face a patchwork of rules and sometimes unclear guidance.
European Union: The EU has taken major steps to establish a unified approach. In May 2023, the EU formally approved MiCA (Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation), a sweeping regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies. “Under MiCA, any company issuing or trading cryptocurrency will need a license, and beginning in January 2026, all service providers will have to obtain authorization” . MiCA sets standards for stablecoins, exchanges, custodians, and includes provisions on reserve requirements and consumer protection. While MiCA does not label Bitcoin as illegal (Bitcoin is freely tradeable in the EU), it will impose requirements on crypto businesses (for instance, exchanges handling Bitcoin must register and comply with anti-money laundering (AML) rules, and crypto advertisements must be clear about risks). Separately, the EU has enforced the Travel Rule (KYC data travel with transactions between service providers) and has considered environmental disclosures for crypto firms (given PoW energy concerns). Notably, individual EU countries have been relatively positive on Bitcoin: Germany allows Bitcoin investments and regards it as private money (sales after 1 year are tax-exempt, etc.), Switzerland (not EU, but in Europe) is very crypto-friendly with clear laws, and places like Portugal had tax-friendly regimes for a while. The UK, post-Brexit, is aligning with a similar approach – in 2023 the UK proposed bringing crypto promotions under financial rules and extending existing financial regulations to crypto businesses in line with U.S. norms . Bitcoin is viewed as property under UK law as well, and the government has expressed intentions to make the UK a hub for crypto with sensible regulation.
China and East Asia: China has taken one of the most hardline stances against cryptocurrency trading and mining. Over the years, China went from being the center of Bitcoin mining and hosting huge trading volumes to effectively banning domestic crypto activities. By 2021, the Chinese government outlawed cryptocurrency exchanges and ICOs, and in September 2021 the People’s Bank of China declared all cryptocurrency transactions illegal. They also cracked down on mining, leading to a mass exodus of Bitcoin miners from China to other countries. “China has instituted bans on cryptocurrency exchanges, trading, and crypto mining.” While owning Bitcoin or using it privately is not a criminal offense for individuals, there is no legal avenue to trade or use it openly in China now. Hong Kong, however, as a special region, has begun permitting licensed crypto exchanges to operate (as of 2023) in a bid to be a crypto hub, signaling a potential shift. Elsewhere in East Asia: Japan has embraced a regulated approach – Bitcoin is recognized legally as a form of property and a means of payment under the Payment Services Act since 2017. Exchanges in Japan must obtain a license and comply with strict AML/KYC and security requirements. “Japan’s Financial Services Agency manages crypto regulations; Japanese citizens can own or invest in crypto, though the country has toughened rules on information sharing between exchanges to combat money laundering.” Japan was one of the first to establish a clear framework after Mt. Gox collapsed (which hit many Japanese investors). South Korea allows crypto trading (it’s popular there), but with strict real-name verification and a ban on privacy coins. Singapore has a friendly yet cautious regime: it encourages blockchain innovation but requires licensing under the Payment Services Act for crypto companies, including compliance with AML and consumer protections.
Developing Countries and Legal Tender Experiments: A few countries have adopted unusually progressive or bold stances on Bitcoin. The most famous is El Salvador, which in September 2021 became the first country to declare Bitcoin legal tender alongside the U.S. dollar. This meant businesses were required to accept BTC for payments if they had the technological means. El Salvador also launched a state Bitcoin wallet (Chivo) and even bought BTC for its treasury. However, this experiment has been controversial domestically and internationally (e.g., the IMF voiced strong concerns). In early 2025, as part of a deal with the IMF, El Salvador reversed the mandatory aspect – the Legislative Assembly abolished Bitcoin’s status as compulsory legal tender in January 2025, making its use voluntary in the private sector . Citizens and businesses can still use it, but no one is forced to, and government transactions (like taxes) are now back in USD only . Despite that, El Salvador’s government, led by President Bukele, continues to be a proponent: the country hosts major Bitcoin conferences and has been buying more BTC for its reserves (holding 6,102 BTC as of March 2025, about $500 million worth) . Another country, the Central African Republic (CAR), briefly made Bitcoin legal tender in 2022 – becoming the second nation to do so. However, CAR’s initiative faced implementation issues and pushback (it’s a small economy with low internet penetration), and its status is unclear as of 2025 – it appears to have pivoted to developing a cryptocurrency hub (project Sango) rather than nationwide Bitcoin use. These cases are being watched as potential precedents; so far, no large economy has followed suit with legal tender, but some countries are exploring state-backed digital currencies (CBDCs) as an alternative approach (though CBDCs are quite different from Bitcoin, being centrally issued).
Other Notable Jurisdictions:
Canada: Bitcoin is legal and Canada was actually the first to approve a Bitcoin ETF (in early 2021, Purpose Bitcoin ETF). Exchanges must register with FINTRAC (financial intelligence unit) and comply with AML laws. Canada has taxed crypto as commodities (capital gains apply) for years. They’ve generally been pro-innovation but also took steps like ordering exchanges to segregate Canadian client funds after some incidents.
Australia: Similar to Canada, legal and treated as property for tax. Exchanges register with AUSTRAC. Consumer warnings are common but no bans.
Latin America: Besides El Salvador, countries like Brazil have been proactive – Brazil passed a law in 2022 providing a regulatory framework for crypto and giving the central bank oversight. Argentina and Venezuela see high Bitcoin usage due to inflation, and while not officially endorsed, authorities have at times imposed capital controls that inadvertently drive crypto adoption. Mexico’s central bank has been skeptical, but many Mexicans use BTC for remittances. Cuba in 2021 said it would recognize and regulate cryptocurrencies, an interesting development for a sanctioned nation.
Middle East: United Arab Emirates (UAE) (particularly Dubai) is aiming to be a crypto-friendly hub with clear licensing (VARA in Dubai). Saudi Arabia is cautious but exploring blockchain. Turkey has high adoption (as an inflation hedge) but banned crypto as a direct payment method in 2021, though trading is allowed.
India: India has oscillated – it considered a ban, then the Supreme Court overturned a banking ban in 2020. Currently, crypto is not banned, but India imposed a heavy tax (30% on gains and 1% transaction tax) in 2022 that dampened trading. They have not finalized a regulatory framework, awaiting global consensus; meanwhile, many Indian investors participate under this tax regime.
Russia: Officially, Russia allows owning crypto but banned using it for payment (rubles are the only legal tender). Due to sanctions and currency issues, Russia in 2023 showed interest in using crypto or CBDC for international trade. Indeed, lawmakers passed a bill to allow crypto for cross-border trade transactions (bypassing SWIFT) , but domestic use in retail is still restricted. Mining is being legalized in some forms as an industrial activity.
Enforcement and Crime Prevention: A major concern of regulators is preventing illicit use of Bitcoin (money laundering, terrorist financing, etc.). Bitcoin’s ledger is transparent, which paradoxically makes it less attractive for serious criminals compared to privacy coins or cash, but its pseudonymity means authorities have to work to link addresses to identities. Agencies worldwide (like the U.S. DOJ, Europol, etc.) have become adept at blockchain analysis. High-profile takedowns, such as the closure of darknet marketplaces and recovery of ransomware payments, have demonstrated that Bitcoin is far from untraceable. Regulators continue to push KYC/AML rules onto crypto service providers – for example, requiring exchanges to collect customer identity and report suspicious transactions, just like banks. The FATF (Financial Action Task Force) has issued guidelines (the “Travel Rule”) that countries are implementing, requiring customer information to accompany crypto transactions above certain thresholds between institutions. In short, the trend is toward normalization: treating crypto businesses much like traditional financial institutions under the law.
Taxation: As noted, most countries tax Bitcoin in some form. Typically, it’s either as an investment (capital gains tax on profits) or as income (if earned via mining or received as payment). Some countries have favorable tax treatment – e.g., Germany (no capital gains if held over 1 year), Portugal (previously tax-free for individuals on crypto gains, though this changed for short-term gains in 2023), and some have high taxes (India’s 30%, as mentioned). Tax agencies have increasingly focused on crypto compliance, issuing guidance to taxpayers and even summoning exchange data to check for unreported gains. By 2025, it’s expected that tax reporting for crypto will be on par with stocks in many jurisdictions (as is happening in the U.S. with 1099-DA forms ).
In summary, the global regulatory landscape for Bitcoin is a patchwork: some countries are very friendly, a few are hostile, but most are converging toward a middle ground of acceptance with regulation. Outright bans are rare (aside from authoritarian regimes or places with capital control worries), because completely banning a decentralized digital asset is difficult – people can always transact peer-to-peer if they are determined. Instead, regulators focus on the gateways: exchanges, payment providers, and businesses. The trend is toward integration of Bitcoin into existing financial laws: requiring exchanges to have licenses, comply with financial regulations, ensure consumer protection (e.g., proof of reserves, security standards), and educating the public about risks. Notably, in 2024, the approval of spot Bitcoin ETFs in multiple countries (U.S., Canada, etc.) signaled a regulatory acceptance that allows Bitcoin to be accessed in familiar investment wrappers .
That said, regulatory risks remain one of the biggest unknowns for Bitcoin’s future. Policies can change with political winds; for example, a new administration might impose stricter rules, or a major economy could attempt heavy-handed restrictions if they see Bitcoin as a threat to their monetary sovereignty. International coordination is still nascent – we don’t have a unified global crypto law, so businesses face complex compliance across borders. Nonetheless, the trajectory suggests Bitcoin is here to stay, and governments are moving from the question of “Ban or not?” to “How to safely integrate and tax this new asset?”. This maturation of regulation is actually seen as a positive by many institutional investors, as it reduces uncertainty and fosters wider adoption under clearer rules.
Major Developments and Recent Innovations
The Bitcoin ecosystem is continuously evolving. In the past few years, several major developments have shaped Bitcoin’s trajectory and expanded its capabilities and integration into the broader financial system. Here we highlight some of the most significant developments:
Approval of Bitcoin Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs): One of the biggest recent milestones for mainstream adoption was the launch of Bitcoin ETFs. After nearly a decade of attempts, U.S. regulators finally gave the green light in Jan 2024 to multiple spot Bitcoin Exchange-Traded Products . This included funds from major institutions like BlackRock (ticker: IBIT) and others. An ETF allows investors to gain exposure to Bitcoin through the traditional stock market, without needing to directly buy or custody the cryptocurrency. The impact was immense: the first year of U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs saw record-breaking inflows, with combined assets under management reaching $129 billion by the end of 2024 . By some measures, BlackRock’s Bitcoin fund became one of the most successful ETF launches in history, gathering tens of billions in assets in months . This ETF wave “democratized” Bitcoin investing for both institutional portfolios and retail 401(k)s . It also signaled a significant shift in regulatory stance – the SEC’s approval (influenced by court rulings and market maturation) was seen as a seal of legitimacy for Bitcoin as an asset. Moreover, other countries had already forged ahead: Canada launched a Bitcoin ETF in 2021; several European exchange-traded products exist; and in 2023–2024 other regions (Australia, Brazil, etc.) also introduced Bitcoin ETFs. The upshot is that Bitcoin is now far more integrated into traditional financial markets. Investors can buy BTC in brokerage accounts, and Bitcoin indices are tracked alongside commodities like gold or oil. Futures and derivatives on Bitcoin have also boomed – CME’s regulated Bitcoin futures (launched 2017) and options are seeing high volumes, and even traditional hedge funds that wouldn’t hold spot BTC might trade futures. All of this contributes to liquidity and price discovery, though some worry it could also increase Bitcoin’s correlation with traditional markets (as discussed earlier).
Taproot Upgrade (2021): The Taproot soft fork activated in November 2021 was the most significant protocol upgrade since 2017’s SegWit. Taproot actually encompassed three Bitcoin Improvement Proposals (BIPs) that together enhance privacy, smart contract flexibility, and efficiency. The core changes:
Schnorr Signatures: Bitcoin switched to Schnorr signatures (from ECDSA) for transaction signatures. Schnorr signatures are more compact and have the property of being aggregatable – multiple signatures in a complex transaction can be combined into one. This means multi-signature (multisig) transactions or ones with multiple inputs can appear on-chain as a single signature . This saves space and improves privacy because multi-sig transactions become indistinguishable from single-sig.
MAST (Merkelized Abstract Syntax Tree): This allows for smart contract conditions (various possible spending conditions for a coin) to be hashed in a Merkle tree and only the executed branch of the script needs to be revealed. In simpler terms, one could lock Bitcoin with several possible ways to spend it (different scripts), but when actually spending, you reveal only the condition that was used, not all the others. This greatly improves privacy and efficiency for more complex transactions like timelocks, hash time locks (used in Lightning channels), or sophisticated smart contracts.
Overall Benefits: Taproot improves privacy (most transactions look similar on-chain, so chain analytics are less able to identify, for example, Lightning channel openings or multisig spends), and it marginally reduces fees for complex transactions (since unused conditions aren’t revealed, and Schnorr reduces the size). Developers are now leveraging Taproot to build more advanced features: e.g., Taproot-powered multisignature schemes that are more wallet- and user-friendly, and features like Point-Time-Lock Contracts (PTLCs) for Lightning (improving Lightning’s privacy). While Taproot’s immediate impact on everyday users was subtle (HODLers wouldn’t notice much difference ), it is considered a critical building block for Bitcoin’s long-term functionality. It lays a foundation for Bitcoin potentially expanding into more complex smart contracts or even DeFi applications directly on Layer-1 or Layer-2, without sacrificing much in terms of security or decentralization . By 2025, we are seeing growing adoption of Taproot outputs and even novel uses like Bitcoin “Ordinal” NFTs which actually use Taproot’s scripting space to embed data (each NFT inscribed on satoshis is enabled by Taproot’s flexibility).
Lightning Network Growth: We discussed Lightning in the Technology section, but it deserves emphasis as a major development. The Lightning Network has moved from a nascent experiment to a vibrant, growing payment network. As of 2025, Lightning is being used in the wild for various purposes: from everyday microtransactions (like buying coffee in El Salvador or tipping content creators online) to powering remittance services. For instance, the country of El Salvador’s Bitcoin wallet relies on Lightning for quick transactions, and startups like Strike use Lightning to facilitate cheap cross-border transfers (even doing fiat-to-fiat transfers under the hood using BTC as the bridge). The network’s capacity and reliability have greatly improved. Public Lightning capacity surpassed 5,000 BTC in early 2025 (a 384% increase since 2020 levels) . Moreover, Lightning implemented improvements such as AMP (Atomic Multi-Path Payments) allowing large payments to be split into smaller ones, and ongoing work on channel splicing (to resize channels on-chain) and BOLT12 offers (for static QR codes and invoices) is making it more user-friendly . Large companies are getting involved: for example, Block (formerly Square) has integrated Lightning into Cash App (which saw 7x Lightning usage growth in 2024) , and is building out Lightning services for merchants. Even Walmart and other retailers have run Lightning payment trials via third-party apps . The Lightning Network is positioning Bitcoin not just as a store of value, but as a viable medium of exchange for the first time in years, addressing the critique that “nobody uses Bitcoin for payments.” This is a critical development for Bitcoin’s adoption: Bitcoin can be a global settlement layer, while Lightning handles day-to-day transfers – fulfilling the original vision of Bitcoin as electronic cash at the user level, without burdening the base chain.
Integration into Traditional Finance: Bitcoin is increasingly integrated into the existing financial system. Beyond ETFs and trading desks, we see:
Custody and Banking: Major banks and fintech custodians are now offering Bitcoin custody or trading services. For example, Fidelity (one of the largest asset managers) has a digital assets division that provides Bitcoin custody to institutional clients and even enabled Bitcoin in 401(k) plans. Bank of New York Mellon (the oldest U.S. bank) launched crypto custody services in 2022, citing client demand. Several neobanks and fintech apps allow users to buy/sell Bitcoin (e.g., Revolut, Robinhood, Cash App). Some countries have allowed banks to hold crypto directly (Germany enabled banks to custody crypto assets for clients with regulation).
Payment Processors & Merchants: Companies like PayPal and Mastercard/Visa have taken strides to integrate Bitcoin. PayPal in 2021 enabled its U.S. and UK customers to buy, sell, and spend Bitcoin within its app, and even to checkout with crypto – meaning PayPal will convert your BTC to fiat for the merchant at the time of payment . Visa and Mastercard have both partnered with crypto platforms to issue crypto-funded debit cards (where users can spend from their Bitcoin balance and the coins get converted to fiat behind the scenes). Visa also directly settled a USDC (stablecoin) transaction on Ethereum in 2021 and has been running pilots for stablecoin settlements with merchants – indirectly fostering a crypto-friendly payments environment that Bitcoin-based stablecoins or Lightning could tap into. Some point-of-sale providers are enabling Lightning payments (e.g., NCR and Stripe have had related projects). While pure Bitcoin payments in retail remain niche, the rails are being built for broader acceptance if needed.
Corporate Treasury and Cross-Border Use: A few corporations followed MicroStrategy’s lead in holding Bitcoin in treasury (though not many have gone as far). Notably, Tesla still holds some Bitcoin (after selling a portion in 2022) and has stated it believes in Bitcoin’s long-term potential. On the other hand, some companies, like those in the tech sector, accept Bitcoin for certain services (e.g., enterprise software firms, web services, etc.). Cross-border trade and remittances is an area where Bitcoin sees quiet but impactful integration: for example, exporters in certain countries have used Bitcoin to evade capital controls or high banking fees, essentially using BTC as a settlement currency. In 2023, amidst geopolitical tensions, even nation-states like Russia and Iran explored Bitcoin/crypto for international trade settlement to bypass sanctions.
Environmental Initiatives and Mining Innovations: With Bitcoin under the spotlight for energy use, there have been major developments in the mining industry:
Many mining companies are shifting to renewable energy sources or using stranded energy (like excess hydro power, flared natural gas from oil fields that would otherwise be wasted, etc.) to mine Bitcoin. This not only addresses environmental criticisms but also turns Bitcoin into a sort of buyer of last resort for energy, potentially improving renewable project economics. By 2025, estimates suggest a significant portion (over 50%) of Bitcoin’s mining network is powered by renewables or waste energy.
Mining as part of grid management: In places like Texas, Bitcoin miners have teamed up with energy grids to provide flexible demand – they can shut off during peak demand (and even sell power back, helping stabilize the grid) and ramp up when there’s surplus. This model gained traction after the 2021–2022 period and shows how Bitcoin mining can integrate into existing energy systems as a stabilizer.
ASIC and hardware improvements: Mining hardware continues to become more efficient (hashes per watt improving). By 2025, new generation ASICs and cooling techniques (e.g., immersion cooling) are increasing the hash rate without proportionally increasing energy consumption.
Regulatory responses: Some regions proposed or enacted rules around mining. Notably, New York State put a temporary moratorium on new fossil-fuel-powered mining in 2022. On the flip side, countries like Kazakhstan, Russia, and U.S. states like Texas actively welcomed miners after China’s ban. So the mining map has changed, but Bitcoin’s mining sector is arguably more transparent and better regulated now (public mining companies disclose operations, etc.).
Notable Software and Network Developments:
Wallet Technology: Wallets have become more user-friendly with features like seed phrase backups, multisig for retail (like Casa, Unchained Capital services), and integration of the Lightning network for easy use (e.g., Phoenix, Muun wallets make sending on Lightning nearly as simple as on-chain). There’s also progress in wallet interoperability and standards (like BIP-21 for URI, and LN-address for Lightning which allows sending to an email-like address).
Privacy Enhancements: Apart from Taproot’s inherent privacy boost, services like CoinJoins (e.g., Wasabi, Samourai Whirlpool) are used by some to break traceability of coins. This remains a cat-and-mouse area: some blockchain analytics companies try to de-mix transactions, while developers enhance privacy tools.
Bitcoin Layer-2s and Sidechains: Beyond Lightning, interest continues in sidechain projects. Rootstock (RSK) has a small ecosystem of Bitcoin “DeFi” using a pegged BTC token for smart contracts. Liquid is used by some exchanges for faster transfers and even Bitcoin-backed tokens. While these are niche compared to Ethereum’s DeFi, they show Bitcoin’s base asset being used in multiple layers.
Upgrades on the Horizon: The developer community is discussing ideas like Covenants (which would allow restricting how coins can be spent in the future – useful for vaults or certain DeFi use-cases) via proposals like CheckTemplateVerify (CTV), and simplicity, a potential new smart contract language for Bitcoin. There’s also attention on making nodes more efficient (so the network can handle more usage). These are still in research or proposal stage, reflecting that Bitcoin development, while conservative, hasn’t stagnated.
In sum, these major developments – from financial integration (ETFs, institutional adoption) to protocol improvements (Taproot, Lightning) – have collectively advanced Bitcoin’s maturity. Bitcoin in 2025 is far more than digital coins on a blockchain; it’s an asset enmeshed in the global financial fabric, a payment network via Lightning, and a technology platform that continues to innovate. Each development has strengthened some aspect of Bitcoin:
ETFs and institutional adoption have increased legitimacy and access.
Upgrades like Taproot have expanded functionality and future potential.
Lightning has tackled scalability for everyday use.
Mining and environmental efforts have addressed sustainability concerns.
And the continued community and developer activity ensure that Bitcoin can adapt to new challenges.
These advancements also indicate how resilient and adaptable Bitcoin’s ecosystem is. Far from being static, the “rules” of Bitcoin (governed by consensus) have managed to change in backwards-compatible ways when needed, and new layers have been built on top – all without a central authority, driven by open-source collaboration. This speaks to the robustness of Bitcoin’s decentralized model even as it grows.
Notable Figures and Institutions in Bitcoin
Bitcoin, being decentralized, has no CEO or formal leadership. However, over the years a number of individuals and institutions have become highly influential in the Bitcoin world – whether through development, advocacy, investment, or significant holdings. Here we outline some of the key figures and entities:
Satoshi Nakamoto (Founder): The creator of Bitcoin remains an enigmatic figure. Satoshi Nakamoto is the pseudonym used by the person or group who authored the Bitcoin whitepaper (2008) and released the first Bitcoin software in 2009. Satoshi actively contributed to the project for about two years before stepping back in 2010, handing over keys to other developers . To this day, Satoshi’s identity is unknown, though many theories and a few claimants have surfaced (none proven). What’s remarkable is that Satoshi mined an estimated ~1 million BTC in the early days – which at current prices is over $100 billion – yet those coins have never moved. Satoshi’s anonymity and silence since 2011 have actually been a boon for Bitcoin’s decentralization: it has no central authority figure, and the mythos of Satoshi adds to its mystique. Nonetheless, Satoshi is often quoted (via forum posts or the whitepaper) as the philosophical bedrock of Bitcoin’s design principles.
Core Developers and Pioneers: Bitcoin’s development and maintenance is handled by a community of open-source developers. Some notable early developers include Gavin Andresen (whom Satoshi made lead maintainer upon departure), Hal Finney (an early Bitcoin user who received the first BTC transaction from Satoshi and contributed to the code), Nick Szabo (cryptographer who invented bit gold, a precursor idea), and others like Jeff Garzik, Mike Hearn (early dev who later left), etc. In later years, developers like Wladimir van der Laan (who was the lead maintainer for many years), Pieter Wuille (author of SegWit and many improvements), Greg Maxwell, Andrew Poelstra, Peter Todd, Matt Corallo, Rusty Russell (Lightning dev), and many more have been key contributors. As of 2021, Bitcoin’s GitHub lists 750+ contributors to the code . These individuals aren’t usually household names, but within the community they command respect. They shape Bitcoin Improvement Proposals (BIPs) and guide the technical roadmap. There is no single leader – changes are proposed and debated extensively; only those with overwhelming consensus (and community support) get adopted, as seen with Taproot’s smooth activation.
Investors and “Whales”: In the investment realm, several figures stand out:
Michael Saylor (MicroStrategy): The co-founder and Executive Chairman of MicroStrategy became one of Bitcoin’s loudest evangelists after directing his company to start buying Bitcoin in 2020. Saylor has since tirelessly promoted Bitcoin as “digital gold” and a hedge against inflation for corporations. Under his leadership, MicroStrategy amassed a huge stash of BTC (over 129k BTC by 2022 and much more by 2025, as noted earlier). Saylor often speaks at conferences and on media about Bitcoin’s benefits, and he’s seen as a pivotal figure in encouraging other CEOs and CFOs to consider Bitcoin for treasury reserves. His bold strategy also showed traditional markets that holding Bitcoin long-term could pay off handsomely (MicroStrategy’s stock became a de facto Bitcoin ETF proxy, rising and falling with BTC’s price).
Elon Musk (Tesla/SpaceX): Elon Musk, the world-renowned entrepreneur, has had a noticeable impact on Bitcoin through both actions and tweets. In early 2021, Musk’s company Tesla bought $1.5 billion of Bitcoin and announced it would accept BTC for car purchases – a major validation at the time that sent Bitcoin’s price soaring. (He later suspended BTC car payments citing environmental concerns, which caused a pullback in price – highlighting his outsized influence on market sentiment). Musk has called Bitcoin “almost as BS as fiat” jokingly, but also “a genius alternative” – his stance has varied, though he’s consistently kept Tesla’s Bitcoin (and he personally stated owning some BTC). Musk’s tweets have at times caused short-term price swings, and he’s one of the most followed people on Twitter (now X), so his comments on Bitcoin (or Dogecoin, which he often touts) are closely watched by traders. While Musk’s direct involvement in Bitcoin’s development is nil, his role as an influencer cannot be denied in the 2020–2021 era. He exemplifies how public figures can affect crypto markets in the short term.
Jack Dorsey (Block, Inc.): Jack Dorsey, co-founder of Twitter and CEO of Block (formerly Square), is a staunch Bitcoin proponent. He believes Bitcoin will be the “native currency of the internet” and has focused Block’s resources on Bitcoin development. Block’s Cash App has been a popular way to buy BTC in the U.S., and they integrated the Lightning Network for instant, low-fee Bitcoin transfers . Dorsey also set up ₿trust (with Jay-Z) to fund Bitcoin development in Africa and India, and Block is working on projects like a Bitcoin hardware wallet and decentralized Bitcoin exchange. Dorsey is influential for advocating Bitcoin (and only Bitcoin, he’s not a fan of other cryptocurrencies) in Silicon Valley and pushing for Bitcoin-friendly features in mainstream apps.
Changpeng Zhao (CZ) and Brian Armstrong: These are CEOs of major crypto exchanges (Binance and Coinbase respectively). While not “Bitcoin figures” per se (they deal with all crypto), their platforms have onboarded millions to crypto including Bitcoin. CZ’s Binance became the largest exchange globally, and his decisions (like listing or delisting certain Bitcoin futures, or comments on regulation) can indirectly influence Bitcoin’s market. Brian Armstrong’s Coinbase, being a U.S. public company, has been instrumental in advocacy and setting compliance standards. Armstrong has lobbied for fair Bitcoin regulation in Washington. Both have substantial wealth tied to crypto and are considered power players in the industry.
Whale Holders: Aside from individuals, Bitcoin “whales” include some early adopters and funds. For example, the Winklevoss twins (Tyler and Cameron) were early Bitcoin buyers in 2012–2013; they reportedly bought tens of thousands of BTC (famously saying “we have 1% of all Bitcoins”) and later founded the Gemini exchange. Tim Draper, a venture capitalist, bought nearly 30,000 BTC in a U.S. government auction of Silk Road seized coins in 2014 – that investment has grown exponentially and he’s been an advocate predicting prices like $250k (though his timelines proved too optimistic). There are also crypto-native investment funds like Pantera Capital, Grayscale (Digital Currency Group), etc., which have large Bitcoin holdings. Grayscale’s Bitcoin Trust (GBTC) has been a notable institution – it holds around 600k+ BTC (though that fluctuates) on behalf of investors in its trust (as of 2023, before potential ETF conversion). Grayscale was one of the first avenues for institutions to get indirect BTC exposure.
Institutional Asset Managers: We’ve mentioned BlackRock’s involvement via an ETF and Larry Fink’s conversion to a Bitcoin advocate . Along with BlackRock, other Wall Street giants like Fidelity, Vanguard (though Vanguard has been more skeptical publicly), Ark Invest (Cathie Wood is a big Bitcoin bull with a $1M long-term price target), Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley (both have offered Bitcoin funds to wealthy clients), and even MassMutual (an insurance company that bought $100M of BTC in 2020) have all dipped in. The cumulative effect is that traditional finance has notables vouching for Bitcoin’s place in a portfolio, which is a far cry from the days when executives like Jamie Dimon (JPMorgan’s CEO) called Bitcoin “a fraud” (though even JPMorgan later changed tune, offering banking services to crypto companies and launching a digital coin for settlement).
Public Figures and Advocates: The Bitcoin community has its share of thought leaders and evangelists who spread understanding of Bitcoin:
Andreas M. Antonopoulos: An early Bitcoin educator and author of Mastering Bitcoin, he has delivered countless talks and written books demystifying Bitcoin’s tech and ethos, greatly influencing newcomers.
Hal Finney: Although he passed away in 2014, Hal was a beloved early Bitcoin pioneer (many think he could have been part of Satoshi’s inner circle or even Satoshi, though he denied the latter). He was the recipient of the first Bitcoin transaction from Satoshi and an outspoken optimist about cryptographic digital cash.
Nick Szabo: Another pre-Bitcoin figure (created the concept of bit gold). He’s often cited in Bitcoin circles for his writings on the history of money and smart contracts. Many see Szabo’s ideas as foundational to Bitcoin’s design.
Elizabeth Stark: CEO of Lightning Labs, she’s a key figure pushing Lightning Network development forward. Along with developers like Tadge Dryja and Joseph Poon (who co-wrote the Lightning whitepaper), Stark represents the next generation ensuring Bitcoin’s scalability.
Cynthia Lummis: A U.S. Senator from Wyoming, Lummis is one of the most vocal Bitcoin advocates in politics. She holds Bitcoin personally and has pushed for pro-crypto legislation and clarity in the Senate. Her presence shows Bitcoin has allies in government as well.
Nayib Bukele: The President of El Salvador, while a political figure, became internationally known in crypto for making Bitcoin legal tender in his country. He often tweets about Bitcoin, buys dips for El Salvador’s treasury, and even plans a “Bitcoin City.” Bukele is seen as a maverick who put a sovereign stamp of approval on Bitcoin, inspiring other politicians (like some in Tonga, or U.S. local politicians) to consider similar moves.
Critical Voices: On the other side, notable skeptics include people like Warren Buffett (who famously called Bitcoin “rat poison squared”), Charlie Munger, economist Nouriel Roubini, and others who frequently criticize Bitcoin’s volatility or lack of intrinsic value. While not “in Bitcoin,” their voices have influenced public perception and have at times caused market jitters or required counter-arguments from the Bitcoin community.
Major Institutions and Corporate Adoption: Aside from the investors and figures, some institutions themselves are noteworthy:
MicroStrategy and Tesla we’ve discussed – they are the largest corporate holders of BTC (MicroStrategy with by far the largest stash , and Tesla with a sizable but smaller amount after partial sell-offs).
Publicly-listed Bitcoin miners (like Marathon Digital, Riot Platforms, etc.) effectively hold and produce BTC as part of their operations, acting as a proxy for exposure. Marathon, for example, holds over 10,000 BTC . These companies often hodl a portion of mined Bitcoin, making them players in accumulation.
Nation-state holders: El Salvador stands out for holding Bitcoin in its treasury (over 6,100 BTC ). Ukraine received tens of millions in Bitcoin donations during its 2022 struggle (not exactly an intentional holder, but shows Bitcoin’s utility in crisis). Some central banks or sovereign funds have begun studying Bitcoin, though none (aside from perhaps very small examples) have publicly added it to reserves as of 2025. There are rumors that countries like Russia or Iran might be mining or using Bitcoin strategically due to sanctions, but hard evidence is limited.
Exchanges and Custodians: The likes of Coinbase, Binance, Kraken, Bitfinex etc., collectively hold hundreds of thousands of BTC on behalf of users (Coinbase alone custodies a vast amount, including for institutional clients). While these coins are user-owned, the exchanges’ policies and security practices have a big impact on Bitcoin liquidity and trust. Hacks or issues at major exchanges have historically affected Bitcoin (e.g., Mt. Gox in 2014, Bitfinex in 2016), whereas today many exchanges have strengthened security and even hold insurance for digital assets.
Payment Companies: Visa, Mastercard, PayPal, Cash App, Robinhood – these mainstream companies offering Bitcoin services were already mentioned, but their significance lies in making Bitcoin available to millions who might not otherwise engage with a crypto-native platform. PayPal’s embrace of Bitcoin in 2020 was a tipping point: suddenly 300+ million users could easily buy Bitcoin in their app, vastly simplifying the acquisition for newbies. Similarly, fintech banking apps integrating Bitcoin have woven it into the fabric of everyday finance.
In conclusion, Bitcoin’s landscape features a wide cast of characters: from anonymous developers to Fortune 500 CEOs to political leaders. The influential voices and major holders can sway market sentiment and advance adoption. Importantly, unlike a company that lives or dies by its CEO, Bitcoin’s decentralized nature means no single figure can make or break it – even Satoshi’s departure did not hinder Bitcoin’s growth. This decentralization of influence is part of Bitcoin’s strength. As of 2025, the community is more diverse than ever: cypherpunks, Wall Street bankers, tech entrepreneurs, and even governments all have a stake in Bitcoin’s success.
Sources:
Current price and market data
Mining, supply and halving information
Proof-of-Work and consensus explanation
Lightning Network functionality and recent usage stats
Taproot upgrade details (MAST and Schnorr)
Bitcoin’s historical price milestones
Market cycle description
China’s ban on trading/mining ; EU’s MiCA regulation
El Salvador legal tender reversal and BTC reserves
Eric Kim is a multifaceted content creator and entrepreneur known originally for his work in street photography, who has in recent years become equally notable for two very different pursuits: extreme weightlifting feats and outspoken Bitcoin advocacy. Born in 1988, Kim built an online following through his photography blog and workshops, but lately he has pivoted to document his intense fitness journey alongside his cryptocurrency investments and philosophies. On his personal websites and social media, Kim openly shares his weight-training milestones and Bitcoin strategies – often blending the two with a unique mix of bravado and philosophy. Observers note that his online persona now encompasses “bitcoin/weightlifting/meat diet/personal philosophy stuff,” as one commenter put it . This report details Eric Kim’s involvement in weightlifting and Bitcoin, highlighting his public projects, content, and the intriguing cross-pollination between his fitness lifestyle and crypto activities.
Weightlifting Achievements and Approach
Kim has garnered attention in the strength training community by pushing the limits of unconventional heavy lifts and broadcasting them online. In late May 2025, he stunned viewers with a rack pull of approximately 1,098 pounds (498 kg) at a body weight of only ~165 lb (75 kg) – over 6.6× his bodyweight . Videos of him performing this feat beltless, barefoot, and chalk-dusted (without a lifting belt or special equipment) “hoisting steel like it’s cotton candy” went viral, leaving onlookers awestruck at what one write-up likened to “a demigod shrugging off mountains” . Kim himself touts this as a “NEW WORLD RECORD” ratio lift (calling it 6.65× bodyweight) and has branded it with hashtags like #DEMIGODMODE . The message is clear: it’s not just strength; it’s a statement – each successful gravity-defying rep seems to scream “I am unstoppable,” broadcasting across the internet like a thunderclap .
Unorthodox Training Philosophy: Eric Kim’s training methods often defy powerlifting orthodoxy, attracting both praise and critique. Rather than focus on standard competition lifts, he centers his training on rack pulls (partial deadlifts starting from the knees or higher) to handle maximal weights. Detractors call rack pulls “ego lifts,” arguing they have poor carry-over to real strength and full-range deadlifts . Legendary strength coach Jim Wendler, whom Kim cites, notes that extreme partial lifts “rarely carry over to the actual deadlift” . Nonetheless, Kim doubles down on this contrarian strategy: he argues that rack pulls can be superior for building strength quickly, smashing the myth of the conventional deadlift as the “king of lifts” . In his blog he acknowledges the controversial elements of his approach – from the dubious functional carry-over of rack pulls to the lack of official legitimacy since such lifts aren’t contested in meets – yet he frames these very quirks as part of his innovation.
Minimalist “Spartan” Style: A signature of Kim’s weightlifting is his minimalist, no-aids style. He shuns supportive gear like weight belts, lifting suits, or even shoes, opting for “just a dip belt, chalk, and raw willpower” when attempting lifts over 1,000 lb . This old-school warrior mindset – going into battle against gravity with no armor except one’s own hardened body – is core to his philosophy. Spectators note the risk (“beltless, un-suited approach at 1,071 lb risks serious injury,” critics warn) , but Kim embraces it as part of the challenge. He uses a mixed grip and chalk on heavy barbell pulls to forge mental toughness, treating each near-maximal attempt as a test of will . By adding small increments (as little as 2.5 lbs per side) every few days – a kaizen micro-loading progression – he reportedly catapulted his rack pull from 710 lb to beyond 1,038 lb within 18 months . This incremental approach, combined with an unwavering one-rep-max focus, exemplifies what he calls “one-rep-max living.” In his own words, he views each monster lift as “a philosophical act — a middle finger to doubt” that fuses stoicism with spectacle . In fact, Kim infuses heavy doses of philosophy (quoting Nietzsche, embracing Stoic ideals) into his training, so much so that he half-jokingly labels himself a “powerlifting philosopher” .
Viral Content and Hype: Beyond the raw feats of strength, Eric Kim has demonstrated savvy in presenting and marketing his lifts to a wide audience. He films his gym exploits in cinematic slow-motion with clouds of chalk exploding off the weights, and peppers them with meme-ready slogans and tags like #Hypelifting and #GodMode . This dramatic, entertainment-oriented approach has effectively created a new “micro-genre” of lifting content that commands social media algorithms and attracts a cult-like following . Every post is designed as a “tactical strike on the algorithm,” combining primal roars and intense visuals to make viewers stop scrolling in awe . The result: Kim’s physique and stunts have been “blowing up the internet,” as one article noted, with engagement and shares skyrocketing . For example, his legendary attempt to shoulder-carry 330-pound dumbbells at Gold’s Gym (famously known as the heaviest dumbbells there) gained viral attention and even local fame at the gym . By mid-2025, Kim’s strength antics had made him something of an online fitness personality – “the talk of the town” in the digital fitness world – not just for the lifts themselves but for the larger-than-life persona and philosophy he projects alongside them.
Fitness Projects and Community: Capitalizing on this momentum, Kim has hinted at turning his fitness passion into a community and business. He introduced an “EK FIT” initiative on his site, describing diet, health and fitness as a “new passion… actually an old passion” dating back to childhood . He even offers fitness consulting services, inviting interested followers to contact him via email for personalized advice or coaching . While much of his fitness content is freely available as open-source blogs, videos, and podcasts, these consulting services and his branded content indicate a venture into fitness entrepreneurship. All of this marks a notable evolution for someone who once was known purely as a photography blogger – Eric Kim has effectively rebranded himself as a modern-day strongman philosopher, blending weight-room exploits with intellectual and entrepreneurial ambitions.
Bitcoin and Cryptocurrency Involvement
Parallel to hoisting heavyweight in the gym, Eric Kim has also immersed himself in the world of Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies, often with equal intensity. He publicly credits Bitcoin with significant financial gains and life lessons. On his blog, Kim revealed that he managed to profit around $250,000 from crypto investments, though this windfall came with an existential twist – he wrote, “After making $250,000 in crypto: It doesn’t matter that much” . This statement reflects a personal philosophy that mere monetary success isn’t everything. Indeed, he emphasizes that true wealth is “your own personal creative thriving and blossoming” , a view consistent with his artist background. Nonetheless, Bitcoin clearly plays a major role in his life: he appends the Bitcoin symbol (₿) next to his name online, maintains a dedicated “ERIC KIM ₿” blog section, and produces daily content related to crypto trading, investment strategies, and macro insights.
Content Creation and Thought Leadership: Kim has become a prolific commentator on Bitcoin, sharing his thoughts via blog posts, podcasts, and videos. His podcast (simply titled “ERIC KIM” on platforms like Apple Podcasts and Spotify) is updated almost daily with bite-sized episodes blending technology, finance, and philosophy . Many episodes focus on Bitcoin – for example, “Why Bitcoin No Bitcoin No Life”, “Bitcoin is 99% Big Balls”, and “Why Bitcoin is My Moral Imperative” are recent titles . The tongue-in-cheek episode “Bitcoin is 99% Big Balls” suggests Kim’s view that success in crypto investing is less about technical know-how and more about bold courage and conviction (having the “big balls” to stomach volatility) . This macho phrasing mirrors the tone of his fitness content, again mixing bravado with insight. In another podcast installment, Kim outright declared “Bitcoin is life on steroids”, implying that Bitcoin can amplify one’s life or results in an almost superhuman way, much like anabolic steroids enhance physical performance (a provocative analogy connecting his two interests) .
On his blog, Kim often discusses Bitcoin in context of broader economic and ethical principles. He has written about Bitcoin for specific audiences – e.g. “Bitcoin for Photographers” and “Bitcoin for Investors” – indicating his aim to educate and persuade others in his circles. Perhaps most telling is Kim’s piece titled “Why Bitcoin is My Moral Imperative. Bitcoin is armor, MSTR is your spear. We the new cyber Spartans.” . In it, he argues that embracing Bitcoin is not just a financial decision but a moral stance, portraying Bitcoin as a form of personal armor in a corrupt financial world, and likening MicroStrategy (MSTR) stock to a spear. (MicroStrategy is the business intelligence company famous for holding billions in Bitcoin on its balance sheet; Kim is an avid follower and shareholder of MSTR.) He rallying-cries that “we [Bitcoin investors] are the new cyber Spartans” , an expression that perfectly encapsulates how he merges the language of battle, virtue, and ancient warrior culture (drawn from his fitness ethos) with his crypto advocacy.
Investment Strategy and Ventures: Unlike many casual crypto enthusiasts, Eric Kim dives deep into strategy and theory. He frequently references the moves of major institutional players – for instance, he closely followed Larry Fink’s statements on Bitcoin and discusses the significance of BlackRock and others potentially entering the Bitcoin market . Kim often emphasizes HODLing (long-term holding) and accumulating Bitcoin as opposed to short-term trading. His investment philosophy mirrors Stoic principles of patience and resilience: he advocates a “set it and forget it” approach to Bitcoin, focusing on long-term freedom and peace of mind rather than chasing quick gains . In line with this, Kim is a vocal proponent of MicroStrategy (MSTR) as a stock investment – essentially using traditional markets as a leveraged Bitcoin play . He explains that owning MSTR shares is a way to indirectly amplify one’s exposure to Bitcoin’s upside (since MSTR’s stock tends to magnify Bitcoin’s movements) . By his analysis, MicroStrategy’s value lies not only in the Bitcoin it holds but in its strategic vision of continually accumulating more, positioning the company as a “long-term player” and perhaps a future cornerstone of the crypto-financial world . This aligns with his belief in “Bitcoin as destiny” – a necessary asset for the future – hence calling Bitcoin investment his imperative.
While Kim’s Bitcoin activities are mostly about content and personal investment (he does not appear to run a separate crypto company or fund), he certainly treats it like a venture. He brands himself as a thought leader at the nexus of Bitcoin and philosophy, often citing luminaries and contrarians. (In one breath he muses, “Besides Nassim Taleb, am I the only powerlifting philosopher out there?” and then, “Am I the only Bitcoin investor, MSTR shareholder who can lift over 1000 pounds?” .) By positioning himself this way, Kim has carved out a niche as a social media personality who can speak about financial sovereignty and physical prowess in the same sentence. His Twitter/X account, which has over 20,000 followers, exemplifies this: one viral post of his in June 2025 read, “This is how it feels being levered long Bitcoin… 1,098 POUND RACK PULL at 165 POUNDS body weight (6.65× leverage)” . Accompanying the post was a video of his massive rack pull, directly equating the leverage ratio of his lift (weight lifted to bodyweight) with a high-leverage bet on Bitcoin. Such content not only entertains but also subtly advertises his dual credibility in both domains – effectively saying: trust the Bitcoin insights of a man who knows how to handle massive weight, both literally and figuratively.
It’s also worth noting that Kim’s entrepreneurial projects span these interests. He continues to sell books and products (through his Haptic Industries brand) and offers workshops, and one can infer he accepts payment from his global audience – likely open to crypto payments given his enthusiasm (though he primarily markets prices in dollars) . He has hinted at launching new ventures (for example, a “crypto strategy” e-book or an online course) but primarily his output has been in freely available content. In any case, Kim’s blending of business with Bitcoin is evident: he leverages his crypto success story as proof of concept for the ideas he sells (literally selling the lifestyle of financial and physical empowerment). He even references having gone “viral” not just for lifting but also in the context of crypto and uses that as social proof of his brand .
Bridging Fitness and Bitcoin: Cross-Pollination
What truly sets Eric Kim apart is how deliberately he intertwines his weightlifting lifestyle with his Bitcoin activities, finding philosophical and practical parallels between the two arenas. He often speaks of “iron sharpeners” and “Spartan mentality” in the same breath as “cyber Hornets” and “hodling Bitcoin”, merging the lexicon of gym culture with that of cryptocurrency. This cross-pollination is both rhetorical and substantive:
Philosophical Overlaps: Kim draws explicit parallels between the discipline required in strength training and the mindset needed for successful investing. He asserts that the mental fortitude and patience to grind out incremental gains in the gym are akin to the stoic patience needed to hold Bitcoin through volatile markets . In a summary of his philosophy, one source noted: “He integrates philosophical concepts into his investment strategies… drawing parallels between the discipline required in weightlifting and the patience needed for long-term investments” . In other words, both endeavors reward conviction and the ability to endure short-term pain for long-term benefit. Kim’s personal mantra “No pain, no gain” applies as much to accumulating sats (satoshis) as to adding plates on the bar.
“Cyber Spartan” Identity: Much of Kim’s crossover branding uses warrior and hero metaphors that apply to both domains. He invokes the image of ancient Spartans – famed for their physical prowess and ironclad mentality – to describe modern Bitcoiners who must be steadfast and brave. In his “moral imperative” post, he writes “Bitcoin is armor, MSTR is your spear. We the new cyber Spartans.” . Here he effectively casts the act of buying/holding Bitcoin as a battle for financial freedom, with himself and like-minded investors as a warrior clan. This mirrors his gym ethos where he forges his body as if preparing for war (recall that he likens his muscle gain to building “body armor” through hardship ). By calling Bitcoin armor, he suggests it protects one’s financial sovereignty; by calling the Bitcoin-heavy MicroStrategy stock a spear, he suggests it’s an offensive weapon in one’s portfolio. Such analogies resonate with fans who see strength and investing success as two sides of a conquering mentality. Kim often refers to this community as an overlapping tribe of “powerlifters, traders, photographers – all converging to worship the same pure spectacle of strength” , reinforcing that he perceives a unity of purpose across his interests.
Social Media Crossover Content: Eric Kim uses his platforms to explicitly link fitness and crypto in entertaining ways. A striking example was his challenge to the community: “Besides Nassim Taleb (who deadlifts and writes), am I the only Bitcoin investor, MSTR shareholder who can lift over 1000 pounds? Join the 1,000 pound rack pull club.” . This call-to-arms (or rather, call-to-legs and back) playfully invites fellow Bitcoin enthusiasts to step up their gym game. It also reinforces Kim’s persona as perhaps the only person straddling both worlds at his level, coining himself a “powerlifting philosopher” and encouraging others to blend physical and financial strength. In another crossover post, as mentioned, he equated a highly leveraged Bitcoin position to the feeling of a 6.65× bodyweight lift, implicitly encouraging Bitcoin holders to strive for similarly outsized “gains” either in the gym or their portfolio . He has even quipped that “Bitcoin is the new steroids” – suggesting that embracing Bitcoin can enhance one’s life and performance with the potency that steroids (controversially) provide to athletes . All of these illustrate a consistent theme: Kim doesn’t compartmentalize his passions; he mashes them up to create a larger narrative of strength, risk, and reward.
Lifestyle and Ideology: The cross-pollination extends to lifestyle choices and values. Kim advocates for a carnivorous diet (high red meat, no sugar/carbs) as part of his fitness regimen and connects it to authenticity in other realms. For instance, one of his provocative blog post titles reads: “Only trust 100% carnivore investors… we are the only ones who ain’t no fake show” . This suggests he sees a through-line between the purity/discipline of one’s diet and the integrity of one’s investing philosophy. It’s an almost Nietzschean “will to power” outlook: those who can stick to eating only meat (no indulgent processed foods) are the same kind of people who will have steel nerves in holding Bitcoin – in Kim’s view, they are real and not “fake show.” He also espouses an anti-materialistic, anti-mainstream ethos in both fields: just as he rejects fancy gym machines for basic barbells , he distrusts mainstream financial advice and fiat-centric thinking, favoring Bitcoin’s decentralized, hardcore ethos. This convergence of fitness, diet, and crypto forms a singular personal philosophy that Kim passionately shares with his audience.
Community and Engagement: By blending these domains, Kim has created an engaged following that might have initially come for one interest but gets exposure to the other. A weightlifting enthusiast stumbling on his #Hypelifting videos will also hear him talking about Bitcoin to the camera; conversely, a crypto podcast listener will find him making analogies to deadlifts and protein diets. He often uses humor and memes to make the crossover accessible. For example, he tags posts with things like #MiddleFingerToGravity (for lifting) and in the same breath talks about giving a middle finger to fiat currency – encouraging a kind of countercultural pride in both arenas . According to his own breakdown, this “meme infrastructure” of hashtags spawns mini-tribes and hype cycles that feed into each other . The cross-tribe collision is very much intentional: Kim celebrates that the “iron game meets crypto game” as lifters and traders find common inspiration in his content . To him, a monumental lift and a bold Bitcoin move are both demonstrations of willpower overcoming limitations. As one of his write-ups dramatically put it, “any barrier—physical, mental, or market-based—can be pulverized with enough conviction” . This motto encapsulates the synergy he sees between breaking PRs (personal records) in the gym and breaking new ground in financial freedom via Bitcoin.
In summary, Eric Kim’s public persona and projects have increasingly sat at the crossroads of fitness and cryptocurrency. He has managed to create a narrative where lifting heavy weights and “stacking sats” (acquiring Bitcoin) are two expressions of the same core values: strength, independence, and self-determination. Whether he’s hoisting a 1000+ pound barbell or making a six-figure crypto trade, Kim approaches it with a similar swagger and philosophical lens. This unique blend has led to media content that is at times entertainingly bizarre – such as gritty gym footage captioned with Bitcoin analogies – but it clearly resonates with a segment of his audience who share passions for personal health and financial sovereignty. While still an unconventional pairing, the cross-pollination of weightlifting and Bitcoin in Eric Kim’s life illustrates how personal branding can bridge seemingly unrelated fields through consistent values and messaging.
Notable Projects and Appearances Linking Both Fields
Eric Kim’s journey has spawned several notable projects, media appearances, and social media highlights that tie together his fitness and crypto interests:
Personal Blog and Open-Source Writings: Kim’s primary outlet is his blog (on erickimphotography.com and erickim.com), where he publishes articles that often weave between topics. Posts like “The Ideal Physiology of the Investor” and “Bitcoin Weight Lifter” explicitly unite the themes, discussing what an investor’s body and lifestyle should be, and even sharing videos titled “Bitcoin Weight Lifter” for motivation . All his posts are provided free (he champions an “all open source everything” approach) but they double as marketing for his ideas and ethos.
Podcast and Video Series: On his podcast, Kim regularly releases episodes that reference both weightlifting and Bitcoin. For example, an episode in May 2025 titled “1,000 POUND ATLAS LIFT BREAKS THE INTERNET” describes a strongman feat and then muses “Besides Nassim Taleb, am I the only powerlifting philosopher out there?”, immediately seguing into Bitcoin by asking if he’s the only Bitcoin investor who can lift that much . In a segment called “How I Lifted 6.6× My Bodyweight”, he not only details the training but frames it as exploring “the limits of the human body” – tying into a mindset of exploring limits in other domains too . Kim has also produced short YouTube videos with titles like “Bitcoin is the New Steroids” and “Money & Bitcoin”, where he appears on camera often in gym attire, talking about economics and lifting interchangeably . These multimedia efforts have the style of motivational clips, likely aimed at inspiring followers in both their financial and fitness goals.
Social Media Posts: On Twitter (X) and other platforms, Kim’s notable posts include the viral 1098 lb rack pull leverage analogy tweet and various pronouncements merging the two worlds (such as declaring “Bitcoin will last forever but your body will not – so train it while you can” – a paraphrase of his musings about mortality and Bitcoin ). He also occasionally engages with figures in both communities; for instance, tagging MicroStrategy or Michael Saylor when discussing Bitcoin leverage, or using weightlifting clips as replies in crypto discussions to make a point about strength and conviction. While not a mainstream celebrity, Kim’s consistent cross-domain presence has earned him podcast guest spots in niche circles – he’s been discussed on photography forums, mentioned on Reddit for his crypto and lifting focus , and his content gets shared among Bitcoin enthusiasts who enjoy his gym analogies.
Public Challenge Initiatives: As mentioned, Kim informally launched the idea of a “1,000 Pound Rack Pull Club” for fellow Bitcoin holders . This isn’t a formal organization, but a social challenge he floated to encourage others to post their big lifts if they want to claim the title of being both a serious lifter and investor. Similarly, he often refers to “joining the 6× bodyweight club” or “Spartan investor guild”, blurring the line between a fitness challenge and a crypto insiders’ club. While these may be largely tongue-in-cheek, they serve to strengthen the crossover community identity he’s cultivating.
Interviews and Media Coverage: To date, most coverage of Eric Kim’s dual pursuits comes from his own platforms or community chatter rather than traditional media profiles. He has not been profiled in major fitness magazines or crypto news outlets yet, but his content has circulated widely enough to prompt discussions. For example, fellow photographers and bloggers have remarked on his drastic shift in content focus – noting that he “talks about crypto, and ego lifts weights” nowadays . There is also anecdotal evidence that his weightlifting PRs have been noticed in gym circles (local powerlifters witnessing his gym feats, etc.) and his Bitcoin opinions have been retweeted within the crypto Twitter space. If Kim continues on this trajectory, it’s conceivable he could appear on a niche podcast or YouTube show about biohacking or crypto lifestyle in the future, as he embodies both.
In conclusion, Eric Kim stands out as a modern renaissance personality who blends physical strength, financial acumen, and philosophical reflection into a singular public narrative. His involvement in weightlifting has yielded both impressive performances (like record-level rack pulls) and a torrent of motivational fitness content. Simultaneously, his involvement in Bitcoin has produced a rich stream of investment commentary, personal success stories, and theoretical musings on freedom and risk. Most interesting is how these two threads reinforce each other in Kim’s life: he uses Bitcoin metaphors to push his lifting further, and uses his lifting as a metaphor for conquering Bitcoin’s challenges. Through public projects, social media posts, and his personal brand, Eric Kim illustrates an unusual but compelling intersection between the gym and the blockchain, inspiring others to pursue greatness in both arenas with equal passion and fearlessness.
Sources:
Eric Kim, “Why Eric Kim’s Weightlifting Approach Is Both Controversial and Innovative” – ERIC KIM ₿ Blog, May 29, 2025 . (Details Kim’s heavy rack pull training, criticism from traditional coaches, and his philosophy of no-belt, high-intensity lifting coupled with viral hype.)
Eric Kim, Home – erickim.com, retrieved 2025 . (Personal notes on making $250k from crypto, interest in strongman-style weightlifting, and announcement of EK FIT fitness consulting.)
Reddit – r/photography, thread “Eric Kim & Dante Sisofo,” 2023 . (Community commentary on Eric Kim’s shift to crypto and weightlifting content.)
Eric Kim, “Eric Kim’s physique is blowing up the Internet” – ERIC KIM Blog, 2025 . (Describes Kim’s 6.6× bodyweight (493 kg at 75 kg) rack pull, viral reception, and his beltless “body armor” training ethos.)
Eric Kim, Podcast on Apple Podcasts, episode listings (June 2025) . (Episode titles and descriptions, including “Why Bitcoin is my moral imperative. Bitcoin is armor, MSTR is your spear. We the new cyber Spartans” and Kim’s claim of being perhaps the only Bitcoin investor who can lift 1000+ lbs.)
“ERIC KIM: MSTR x Bitcoin x Philosophy” – EricKim.com article, 2024 . (Summarizes Kim’s views on MicroStrategy as a leveraged Bitcoin play and how he parallels weightlifting discipline with long-term investing discipline.)
Eric Kim, Twitter post (@erickimphoto on X), June 2025 . (Tweet analogizing a 1,098 lb rack pull at 165 lb BW (6.65×) to being levered long on Bitcoin, highlighting Kim’s habit of mixing financial and fitness metaphors.)
Eric Kim, “Bitcoin is Life on Steroids” – Spotify podcast transcript, 2025 . (Kim discusses the “cross-tribe collision” of the iron game and crypto game, asserting that any barrier – physical or market-based – can be smashed with enough conviction.)
Eric Kim, “Only trust 100% carnivore investors…” – ERIC KIM ₿ Blog, June 6, 2025 . (An example of Kim linking diet/fitness extremism to investor authenticity, part of his holistic philosophy merging health and wealth.)
Eric Kim – a photographer and blogger known for his contrarian lifestyle ideas – is a vocal proponent of a 100% carnivore diet, meaning he eats exclusively animal-derived foods (primarily red meat and organ meats) while avoiding virtually all plant foods. Kim has integrated this meat-only diet with intermittent fasting, typically eating one large meal per day, and he frames it as part of a broader personal philosophy of health, productivity, and self-discipline . Below is a comprehensive look at Kim’s carnivore diet principles, his rationale and motivations, the public statements he’s made about it, and how he compares it to other dietary approaches.
Core Tenets of Kim’s Carnivore Diet
A thick steak seasoned with herbs – a typical example of the meat-centric meals in the carnivore diet.
All-Meat Intake: Kim’s diet is composed entirely of animal products, especially fatty red meats and organ meats like beef liver, heart, and ribs . He eliminates all vegetables, fruits, grains, and sugars, famously quipping that “plants are for cows,” not for humans . Even relatively lean or traditionally healthy foods such as fish, chicken, or nuts are deemed unnecessary in his view – he considers true “meat” to be the fatty portions of ruminant animals, rich in cholesterol and nutrients . Eggs and high-fat cuts of pork (e.g. pork belly or ribs) are included, and he sometimes adds fermented condiments like kimchi or herbs, not for their own nutritional value but to help digest large quantities of meat (the sour/bitter flavors cut the richness) .
Organ Meats and Fat as “Apex Nutrition”: A cornerstone of Kim’s approach is consuming organ meats and high-fat animal foods for maximum nutrition. He argues that organ meats are nutrient powerhouses crucial to his diet. For example, Kim calls beef liver a “natural steroid” because of its extremely high cholesterol content – believing that more dietary cholesterol directly boosts testosterone and vitality . He routinely eats beef liver, heart, bone marrow, and even intestine or neck-bones, touting them as the foods that let him “extract the maximum amount of power and nutrition” from his diet . In his words, meat (especially organ meat) is the “apex nutrition” for achieving superior strength, energy, and even mental clarity .
Intermittent Fasting (One Meal a Day): Kim pairs carnivore eating with an intermittent fasting regimen. He skips breakfast and lunch entirely, consuming just one enormous meat-heavy meal in the evening . This one-meal-a-day (OMAD) schedule, he says, has been easy and sustainable for him – he claims to have eaten this way for 5+ years without hunger issues . Fasting during the day not only frees up time and focus, in his view, but also keeps his body in a fat-burning state. He notes that eating only once daily (often after a day of physical training) makes that meal immensely satisfying: “Breaking your fast when you are insanely hungry is like an orgasm… The food tastes 10000000x better than if you are eating all the time!” he wrote, describing how fasting amplifies the pleasure of eating . Kim also credits this routine with helping maintain low body fat and stable energy levels, as his body fuels itself on fats in the absence of constant meals .
No Carbohydrates or Supplements: In line with carnivore principles, Kim’s diet has virtually zero carbs. He deliberately avoids all sugars and starches and even forgoes plant-based “keto” staples like avocados or almonds (calling avocados “actually quite sweet” and nuts too starchy) . He takes no protein shakes or workout supplements either – only real meat. After experimenting with conventional bodybuilding nutrition earlier in life, he concluded that he could gain muscle “just fine” with no carbs or protein powder at all . In his experience, eating a surplus of fatty meat provides enough protein and calories for strength training. Kim even abstains from common stimulants or enhancers beyond caffeine: he drinks black coffee but avoids pre-workout supplements, creatine, or any performance-enhancing drugs, aligning with his ideal of “natural strength” built on diet and discipline .
Kim’s Motivation and Rationale
Peak Physical Performance: A driving motive behind Kim’s carnivore diet is maximizing strength and testosterone naturally. He explicitly equates eating meat with a natural anabolic boost, stating that “Meat is a steroid… The more you eat meat, the more you increase your testosterone.” . By prioritizing cholesterol-rich animal fat and protein, Kim believes he’s giving his body the raw materials for hormone production and muscle-building. He often highlights his personal results as evidence: for instance, Kim reports that on this diet he has deadlifted over 500 lbs easily in a fasted state, and put on significant muscle mass – all while consuming no carbs at all . He rejects the common notion that athletes “must” eat carbohydrates for energy or bulking, pointing to himself as proof that strength can be built on an all-meat, ketogenic fuel source . In his view, “the more meat you eat, the stronger you will become,” and he notes that almost all top bodybuilders (aside from their steroid use) have traditionally been heavy meat-eaters . Thus, he sees carnivore nutrition as giving an “additional edge” for reaching peak levels of physiological fitness .
Health, Energy, and Vitality: Kim portrays his carnivore lifestyle as a path not just to strength but to overall health and vitality. He frequently counters skeptics by asserting that he feels better than ever eating this way. For example, he writes that his digestion is excellent on an all-meat regimen, calling the supposed need for fiber overrated . Despite consuming zero fiber, he reports no gastrointestinal issues. Likewise, he says his daily energy levels are high and steady, even with only one meal per day, and that intermittent fasting on meat has been “easy” for him in the long term . Kim argues that humans are fully capable of thriving without plant foods: “You will not die by eating only meat,” he insists, addressing the common concern that an all-meat diet lacks essential nutrients . In his writings, he acknowledges that technically a person “won’t die” on various diets (even a strict vegan diet), but he then asks: is the goal merely to not die, or to thrive? . For Kim, the answer is to thrive, and he believes a carnivorous diet enables a level of robust health, strength, and metabolic efficiency that plant-inclusive diets do not. He credits the diet with helping him reduce body fat and increase muscle, “giving me more energy and power” than any other way of eating he’s tried .
Mental Clarity and Productivity: Interestingly, Kim links his diet to mental performance and creativity as well. He refers to meat as the fuel for an “epic” mind. “By consuming more meat (which I consider the apex nutrition), then can we think more epic thoughts, create more beautiful artworks, and become more epic!” he posits . This belief is part of his broader argument that physical supremacy through diet also yields mental benefits – sharper focus, higher drive, and creative inspiration. Kim finds that training and working in a fasted state (powered by fat from yesterday’s meat) makes him more productive and mentally acute during the day . Hunger, he argues, can be a motivator (“like a lion hunting for its meal”), and then eating a huge evening steak feast provides a rewarding dopamine hit that leaves him deeply satisfied and ready for rest . He even suggests that if one eats a meat-rich diet, one’s mind will be clearer and capable of more profound thoughts than if one were sluggish from a carb-heavy or plant-based diet. Essentially, Kim views his carnivore diet as brain fuel for entrepreneurial and creative endeavors, not just fuel for muscles . This ties into the next aspect of his philosophy – the lifestyle and philosophical principles behind his dietary choice.
Philosophical and Lifestyle Foundations
Kim’s advocacy of a 100% carnivore diet goes beyond nutrition – it’s intertwined with his personal philosophy about nature, freedom, and self-mastery:
“Apex Predator” Mindset: Kim often invokes evolutionary and ancestral logic to justify meat-exclusive eating. He argues that humans evolved to be opportunistic carnivores/omnivores, and that eating abundant meat is in line with our natural design for survival and dominance . In his view, Homo sapiens didn’t evolve to subsist on salads; rather, our ancestors thrived by hunting animals and consuming nutrient-dense meat and fat whenever possible. He even notes that in many traditional societies, fatty meat is culturally valued, whereas lean meats or plant foods are secondary . This evolutionary perspective leads him to reject the idea that there is anything “unnatural” about an all-meat diet. We can survive on many diets, he concedes, but to reach our peak potential – “to reach another peak level of physiological fitness” and capability – he believes eating like a apex predator (high on the food chain) is optimal . Ultimately, Kim calls meat-eating “the fundamental part of human dietary evolution” and views meat as “the apex nutrition” that can fuel not only physical strength but human advancement in general .
Personal Freedom and Anti-Conformity: A recurring theme in Kim’s writing is dietary freedom – the right to eat meat unapologetically despite social pressures. He has openly railed against what he labels an “anti-meat bias” in modern society . In a 2020 podcast titled “The Anti-Meat Conspiracy,” Kim argued that contemporary culture unfairly demonizes carnivores: “One of the worst ills in modern society is this vehement anti-meat bias,” he wrote, noting that if you proudly declare “I love to eat meat!” in polite company, people look at you as if you’re a monster “killing the planet” . He perceives a trend where being vegetarian or vegan is seen as morally superior, and he pointedly rejects that moral framing. Kim encourages meat-eaters not to feel guilt or shame. “If people want to eat meat, they should be allowed to eat meat in unlimited quantities, without being judged by others for doing so,” he insists . This stance is part of his broader contrarian ethos – he often warns against blindly following popular “food dogma” or health trends, urging individuals to question mainstream nutritional advice and think for themselves . Kim applies this skepticism to all sides: he suggests people be critical even of his own claims, but he shares his perspective because it has genuinely worked for him . In essence, his carnivore philosophy doubles as a statement of individual autonomy: an assertion that one should have the liberty to follow an unconventional diet that feels optimal, regardless of societal norms.
Stoicism, Discipline, and Strength: Kim’s diet is one facet of a larger stoic lifestyle he promotes, emphasizing discipline, resilience, and harnessing primal instincts. He speaks of treating his body “as a work of art” and exercising self-mastery in all aspects – diet, exercise, and even mindset . Eating only meat and fasting requires a certain mental toughness, and Kim embraces that. He frequently references Spartan or “warrior” metaphors: for example, training fasted and abstaining from indulgences as a way to toughen the mind and body. He sees challenges (like intense hunger or tough workouts) as opportunities to strengthen his willpower . This philosophy extends to rejecting modern comforts or vices – Kim doesn’t drink alcohol or soft drinks, avoids junk food, and even shuns things like sugary condiments (not just for health, but as a practice of discipline). The carnivore diet, being very minimalistic and stringent by conventional standards, aligns with his stoic approach: it’s simple (just meat), it’s demanding (no snacks or treats), and it yields what he views as pure, natural strength. Kim proudly notes that he achieves his muscular physique “all natty” (all natural) without steroids or even protein supplements, attributing it to hard training and meat alone . In summary, eating 100% carnivore for Kim is as much a lifestyle choice about strength and character as it is a nutritional strategy.
Ethics and “Human-Centered” Morality: On the ethical front, Kim takes a clear stance that human well-being takes precedence over animal life. He does not subscribe to the idea that killing animals for food is immoral in the context of human benefit. In a blunt phrasing, he stated: “No matter what, a human life will ALWAYS be infinitely superior to an animal life of any kind.” . He even posed the rhetorical question, “Should we treat animals equivalently to humans?” and answered it with “I say no” . While he doesn’t advocate cruelty, he fundamentally disagrees with vegan ethical arguments that put animal life on the same moral plane as humans. Kim also expresses skepticism toward the environmental arguments against meat. He suspects that influential figures (he calls out people like Bill Gates and James Cameron) promote plant-based diets or alternative proteins for ulterior motives, what he dubs a “hidden” agenda or “virtue signaling” that might mask profit incentives (for example, investments in pea protein or farmland) . In his “Anti-Meat Conspiracy” essay, he implies that the push to reduce meat consumption is a propaganda that could actually harm public health by denying people optimal nutrition . He goes so far as to label the growing popularity of veganism as a “public health issue” if it leads to malnourishment in children raised without animal foods . This controversial stance underlines that, for Kim, the benefits of meat are non-negotiable – ethical or environmental qualms should not override what he perceives as better health for humans. (He often points out that virtually all human activities have some environmental cost, and eating meat is just one of many things people do in the course of living on the planet .)
Public Statements and Content on Carnivore Diet
Eric Kim has been extremely open about his carnivore diet in his online platforms, often sharing personal anecdotes, experiments, and bold statements to spread his philosophy:
Blog Articles: Kim’s primary outlet is his blog (previously on erickimphotography.com and also on erickim.com), where he has published numerous posts about meat eating. Some of his article titles are provocative and encapsulate his stance, such as “Why I Eat Meat,” “Meat is King,” “Eating Meat Doesn’t Make You Fat,” and “The More Meat You Eat, the Stronger You Will Become.” . In an August 2022 post simply titled “100% Carnivore Diet,” Kim recounted his personal experience and conclusions from embracing all-meat eating. He noted point by point that his digestion was fine without fiber, his energy was excellent with one meat meal a day, and that he’d been able to gain muscle and lift heavy weights for years with zero carbs . He even began that post by debunking a common fear: he asked rhetorically “But will you die of a heart attack?” on a meat diet, implying that he believes the answer is no (though the post didn’t elaborate much under that heading) . Across his writings, Kim keeps returning to the theme that eating only meat is not harmful – a message to encourage readers to not fear saturated fat or cholesterol. For instance, one blog entry flatly assures readers: “You will not die by eating only meat.” .
Podcasts and Videos: Kim has also discussed his carnivore philosophy in audio and video formats. He hosted a podcast episode titled “The Anti-Meat Conspiracy” (August 25, 2020) in which he spoke for ~10 minutes about society’s bias against meat and why he believes that bias is misplaced . In that podcast (and its corresponding blog notes), he “praised meat” as a crucial part of human diet and vented about how proclaiming one’s love of meat has become socially taboo . Additionally, Kim shares casual videos; for example, a YouTube video called “100% Carnivore Diet – All Natty Flex” (October 2023) shows him shirtless and muscular in his kitchen, presumably to demonstrate the physical results of his diet and training (the blog page for this video is filled with photos of his physique and plates of meat) . Through such content, he often uses himself as an example to inspire or challenge others – essentially saying, “This is what’s possible with an all-meat diet and no steroids.” Kim’s online presence also blends other interests (like photography, philosophy, and Bitcoin) with his diet advice, but he consistently returns to carnivore eating as a foundation for his lifestyle.
Notable Quotes: Throughout Kim’s articles and posts, a number of catchphrases or recurring claims sum up his carnivore philosophy. A few examples in his own words:
“Plants are for cows.” – Emphasizing that humans don’t need to eat grass or leaves, and that we should let herbivorous animals turn plants into meat for us .
“Meat is the apex nutrition.” – Suggesting that meat is the top-tier food for humans, delivering superior nourishment compared to anything else .
“Cholesterol (meat) is a steroid.” – Arguing that cholesterol from meat acts like a natural anabolic steroid in the body (since cholesterol is the building block for testosterone and other hormones) .
“Eating meat doesn’t make you fat.” – Countering the idea that red meat or animal fat is responsible for obesity; Kim blames sugars and processed carbs for weight gain, not steak.
“If you’re vegetarian or vegan, it kind of messes up your brain.” – A controversial remark where Kim half-jokingly suggests that plant-based diets may impair clear thinking . This reflects his anecdotal observation that many people he’s met who avoid meat also hold perspectives he deems impractical (he even linked one acquaintance’s anti-meat diet with that person’s skepticism about Bitcoin, implying a pattern he distrusts) .
These quotes illustrate how Kim often provokes debate. He does not shy away from blunt assertions that favor meat and dismiss plant-based ideals. By coining such phrases, he makes his position memorable and clear to his audience.
Comparisons to Other Diets and Criticisms
Carnivore vs. Other Low-Carb Diets: Kim generally aligns with the broader low-carb, high-fat school of thought, but he takes it to an extreme by excluding plants entirely. He has explicitly compared a carnivore diet to the ketogenic diet. While acknowledging that keto (high fat, very low carb with moderate protein) can be effective for fat loss, Kim argues that carnivore is even more effective . The key difference, he says, is that classic keto still entertains plant foods and aims for a delicate macronutrient balance, whereas carnivore is both high-fat and high-protein with no concern for carb intake at all (carbs are essentially zero) . He criticizes concepts like “net carbs” (used in keto circles to discount fiber carbs) as “nonsensical… just a way for corporations and individuals to try to game the system.” In Kim’s view, counting carbs or calories is unnecessary if one’s diet is pure meat; the body will naturally regulate appetite and burn fat. He even chides keto dieters who load up on things like avocados, almonds, or artificial sweeteners – in his experience, cutting all that out in favor of just meat yields better results and simplicity .
Critique of Plant-Based Diets: Kim is an outspoken opponent of veganism and even moderated vegetarianism when it comes to health. As noted, he believes plant-exclusive diets cannot support optimal human thriving and may lead to nutrient deficiencies. He often points out that meat provides certain nutrients (B vitamins, heme iron, cholesterol, omega-3 fats, etc.) in forms that plants cannot. One of his gravest concerns is the impact on children: “If parents and kids are getting suckered into becoming vegan… this is a huge public health issue,” Kim writes, warning of “under-nourished future children.” He argues that well-meaning but misinformed parents might deprive their kids of essential nutrition during critical growth years by following vegan trends. This strong stance is born from both his interpretation of nutritional science and his personal anecdotal journey (he recalls that as a child, he himself suffered from a bad diet of sugary, processed foods and had to learn the hard way about proper nutrition) . Kim’s skepticism extends to vegetarians and “plant-based” dieters too – he humorously suggests that avoiding meat might cloud one’s thinking or convictions . In a recent tongue-in-cheek blog post titled “Don’t trust vegetarians or vegans,” he shared an anecdote of a person whose judgment he doubted, linking it to that person’s vegetarian diet, and concluded facetiously, “Only trust 100% carnivore investors… we are the only ones who ain’t no fake show.” . While clearly an exaggeration, it underscores how strongly Kim champions meat as a cornerstone of not just health but even character and credibility.
Common Criticisms of Carnivore Diet (and Kim’s Responses): Outside of Kim’s own sphere, the carnivore diet is highly controversial. Mainstream nutrition experts often raise concerns about entirely cutting out fruits, vegetables, and fiber. Critics argue that an all-meat diet may lead to deficiencies in certain vitamins (like vitamin C or folate), lack fiber for gut health, and could raise LDL cholesterol to unhealthy levels given the high saturated fat intake. Kim is aware of these critiques and addresses them in his content, usually to dismiss them based on his personal results and some evolutionary logic:
Nutrient Deficiencies: Kim contends that meat (especially organ meat) covers human nutritional needs comprehensively. He points to traditional cultures (e.g. Arctic Inuit or Plains Native Americans) that lived on mostly meat and were healthy. He personally reports excellent bloodwork (though specifics are rarely cited) and highlights the rich vitamin and mineral content of liver, heart, and eggs which he eats regularly. In short, he argues you can get “all the nutrients you need from meat alone” and calls fears of scurvy or deficiency unfounded if one includes organ meats and occasional herbs/ferments for micronutrients. His stance: nutrient density of meat > diversity of plant foods.
Fiber and Digestion: Contrary to conventional advice that fiber is necessary for digestion, Kim says his digestion is better without fiber. He has described his gut function on carnivore as very regular and “fine,” whereas previously (on carb diets) he experienced more bloating or indigestion . He labels fiber needs “overhyped” and believes that human digestive systems can adapt to very low fiber just as carnivorous animals’ systems do.
Cholesterol and Heart Health: Kim does not believe that eating red meat and animal fat will ruin his heart health. In fact, he embraces high cholesterol intake – as noted, he calls cholesterol beneficial and necessary for hormones. He cites the view (held by some low-carb researchers) that dietary cholesterol and saturated fat are not inherently dangerous in the context of low carbohydrate intake. His quip that “cholesterol is a steroid” hints at his belief that cholesterol from meat is more friend than foe. While Kim hasn’t published his own long-term heart data, he often alludes to feeling cardiovascularly fit (e.g., he does intense workouts and endurance hikes with no issues). Essentially, he sides with the school of thought that blames sugars and processed foods – not natural animal fats – for modern chronic diseases.
Sustainability and Social Aspects: Another critique of carnivore dieting is practicality and social sustainability – it’s a restrictive regimen that can be hard to maintain and socially isolating (few foods, difficulties eating out, etc.). Kim counters this implicitly by showcasing how easy and satisfying he finds his routine. He has even written posts on “How to Eat More Meat” and how to cook simply (he often pan-fries steaks or slow-cooks ribs and shares these meals on his blog) . By highlighting the simplicity (“just cook meat, add salt, eat once a day”) he frames carnivore as more straightforward than complex dieting or meal prepping. Socially, Kim appears unbothered by being an outlier at dinner tables – his philosophy of personal freedom means he’ll unabashedly eat a plate of beef while others have pasta, and he encourages followers to do the same if they believe in it.
It’s worth noting that Kim’s perspective exists on the fringe of nutritional science. While anecdotal success stories like his are not uncommon in carnivore diet communities, medical consensus has not endorsed all-meat diets due to the above concerns. However, Kim’s 100% carnivore philosophy is internally consistent with his experiences and worldview. He acknowledges that others might question it – in fact, he invites skepticism but simply encourages people to “judge by results”. And by his own account, his results on the carnivore diet have been stellar in terms of strength, physique, and mental focus . This conviction is why he remains a staunch advocate for the all-meat lifestyle despite criticisms.
Conclusion
In summary, Eric Kim’s carnivore diet philosophy is about far more than just food – it’s a statement about optimal living as he sees it. At its core, the philosophy holds that meat is the ultimate fuel for human body and mind, enabling peak performance, health, and even happiness. Kim’s regimen of eating 100% animal-based foods (largely red meat and organ meats), combined with intermittent fasting, is the practical expression of these beliefs. He argues that this approach has allowed him to become stronger, leaner, and more productive than any other diet he’s tried, and he backs it up with personal anecdotes – from monumental deadlift achievements to effusive descriptions of how good he feels. Surrounding the nutritional aspects is a framework of personal freedom and challenge: Kim enjoys that his carnivore lifestyle defies convention, and he links it to a philosophy of self-discipline and resilience (a bit like a modern-day stoic warrior diet). He openly challenges mainstream views that vilify red meat, calling out an “anti-meat conspiracy” and urging people not to feel guilt for eating what he considers our species’ most natural and beneficial food .
Kim’s 100% carnivore stance certainly attracts controversy – many would argue it’s too extreme – yet he has built a following who see him as proof-of-concept for carnivore success. Whether one agrees or not, his contributions to the discussion are notable for pairing diet with philosophy. As one summary of Kim’s meat-driven creed put it: he believes eating meat, especially in liberating quantities, helps individuals reach higher levels of fitness, creativity, and self-actualization . In his own words, he views meat as “apex nutrition,” the key to unlocking both bodily strength and even the ability to “think more profound thoughts and create greater art.” In the end, Eric Kim’s carnivore diet philosophy is a fusion of nutrition and life ethos – championing a return to primal foods and instincts as the pathway to becoming one’s strongest, most “epic” self.
Sources:
Eric Kim, “100% Carnivore Diet,” EricKimPhotography Blog (Aug. 24, 2022)
Eric Kim, Blog – various posts on carnivore diet, e.g. “Carnivore Diet” (Feb. 2, 2022) , “A Critique of the Loser Mentality” (Mar. 3, 2024) , “Don’t Trust Vegetarians or Vegans” (June 6, 2025) , etc.
Eric Kim, “The Anti-Meat Conspiracy,” EricKimPhotography Blog (Aug. 25, 2020) .
Eric Kim, Podcast – The Eric Kim Podcast, episode “The Anti-Meat Conspiracy” (2020) .
Eric Kim, Quotes Compendium on meat eating (Eric Kim blog, 2024) – includes Kim’s quotes on meat & creativity, personal freedom in diet, etc. .
EricKim.com – “Unleashing High Testosterone…” (2023) – outline of Kim’s diet and training regimen .
Note: All information is drawn from Eric Kim’s own writings and content, reflecting his personal perspective and claims .
Eric Kim performing a heavy mid-thigh rack pull. In June 2025, Kim hoisted a staggering 498 kg (1,098 lb) off the rack at a body weight of only 75 kg (165 lb) – an unprecedented 6.65× bodyweight feat done barefoot and beltless .
The Record Lift and Original Video
On June 4, 2025, Eric Kim stunned the strength world by successfully completing a 498 kg (1,098 lb) rack pull at a body weight of ~75 kg (165 lb) . This lift – essentially a partial deadlift performed from the mid-thigh level – was captured on video and quickly shared across multiple platforms. Kim initially posted the video on his personal blog, which included a direct video file of the lift , and simultaneously announced it on social media. The YouTube upload (titled “1,098 Pound Rack Pull (6.65× Body-Weight)”) went live within an hour of the attempt . He also shared the achievement on Twitter (X), including a YouTube link in a celebratory post, captioned “GRAVITY JUST GOT CANCELLED,” to signal the monumental nature of the feat .
Where to watch: The primary footage of the 498 kg pull is available on YouTube via Kim’s channel (e.g. NEW ERIC KIM WORLD RECORD: 498 KILOGRAM RACK PULL… video) . Kim’s official profiles – such as his Twitter @erickimphoto and Instagram @erickimfit – also featured clips or announcements of the lift, ensuring it reached a broad audience. On Kim’s blog, the accomplishment is highlighted with bold headlines and even a .MOV file for download , underscoring that he wanted the evidence widely accessible. Within 24 hours, the YouTube clip had amassed over 3 million views , demonstrating how rapidly the video spread through the online strength community and beyond. Kim’s prompt posting of a 6-second “teaser” clip on social media (followed by the full-length YouTube video and a detailed blog write-up) was a deliberate strategy to generate viral buzz .
Who Is Eric Kim? Athlete Background
Eric Kim is an unconventional figure in strength sports – “the street-photographer-turned-lifting-legend,” as one write-up fittingly describes him . Born in 1988 (37 years old as of 2025) , Kim originally gained recognition in creative circles for his work in photography and blogging. In recent years, however, he pivoted to hardcore strength training, applying the same intensity to lifting that he once did to street photography. Standing around 5’11” (180 cm) and 75 kg in body mass, Kim maintains a remarkably lean physique (~5% body fat by some estimates) alongside his extraordinary strength . This contrast – a relatively light, aesthetic build moving absurdly heavy weights – is part of what makes his feats so attention-grabbing.
Training and discipline: Kim’s athletic focus could be described as powerlifting-oriented, though he is not a competitive powerlifter in the traditional sense. He has dubbed his philosophy “One-Rep-Max Living,” treating the pursuit of one-rep max achievements as a lifestyle and metaphor . His training centers on the rack pull (a partial deadlift from knee or mid-thigh height), which he treats as a personal testing ground rather than a competition event . Kim performs these lifts in his home garage gym with minimal equipment – typically no lifting belt, no wrist straps, and often in a fasted state and barefoot . By avoiding supportive gear, he emphasizes “raw” strength and grip, albeit over a shorter range of motion than a full deadlift.
Major achievements: In the lead-up to the 498 kg pull, Kim had been steadily breaking his own overload PRs. Over spring 2025 he hit milestones of 461 kg (1,016 lb), 466 kg (1,027 lb), 471 kg (1,038.8 lb), and 493 kg (1,087 lb) in the rack pull, each time inching closer to the half-ton mark . Each of these was an “unofficial world record” in terms of pound-for-pound deadlift variants, given that no lifter of his size had demonstrated such weight handling. He typically increased the load by only ~1–2% at a time, a tactic of micro-loading (adding +1.25 kg plates to each side in each session) that he credits with compounding into enormous gains over months . By June 2025, this progression culminated in the 498 kg (1098 lb) achievement – approximately 6.65× his body weight, an astonishing power-to-weight ratio rarely (if ever) documented in strength sports . For comparison, legendary strongman Brian Shaw’s noted 1,365 lb rack pull at ~440 lb bodyweight yields ~3.1× BW, and Eddie Hall’s 500 kg (1102 lb) standard deadlift at 186 kg bodyweight is ~2.7× BW . Kim’s 6.6× BW pull thus “stands out as an extraordinary achievement for a non-competitive lifter,” doubling the pound-for-pound numbers of much heavier champions .
It’s worth noting that Kim has no formal powerlifting meet records or titles – his lifts are done outside of competition, for personal accomplishment and online sharing. In a sense, he is self-sponsored and self-staged, turning his garage into the arena. His background as a content creator means he approaches these feats with an eye for presentation and storytelling. Indeed, Kim often frames his lifting in almost mythic terms (referring to “DEMIGOD mode” and calling himself Gravity’s worst enemy) and ties it to a broader message about pushing limits. He has openly discussed goals like a 907 kg (2,000 lb) “leveraged pull” and even a one-ton deadlift variant down the line , showing that he views 498 kg not as an endpoint but as a stepping stone toward even more outlandish objectives.
Reactions and Internet Buzz
The online reaction to Eric Kim’s 498 kg rack pull was explosive, cutting across social media platforms, forums, and even unexpected communities. Within hours, the lift went viral, prompting both awe and debate. Below is an overview of how different corners of the internet responded:
Reddit: Multiple threads sprouted up across Reddit, from mainstream fitness communities to niche groups. On r/weightroom – a subreddit known for serious strength discussion – a “plate police” mega-thread amassed over 1,000 comments analyzing Kim’s video frame by frame . Users scrutinized the bar bend, plate markings, and moment arms to verify the lift’s authenticity, initially skeptical that a 165 lb person could move that load. In the end, the crowd-sourced verdict was “nothing fake here,” as skeptics conceded that the physics (e.g. a ~44 mm bar bend) matched a real half-ton load . These once-skeptical commenters even became evangelists – the “forensic GIFs and spreadsheets” generated in r/weightroom were cross-posted to other subreddits , turning debunkers into inadvertent promoters of Kim’s feat. Other subs like r/Fitness, r/Powerlifting, and even r/CryptoCurrency and r/Stoicism saw posts about the lift . One Reddit thread title tellingly called Kim “Proof-of-Work incarnate,” humorously comparing his raw effort to the energy-intensive proof-of-work concept in Bitcoin mining . In the first 12 hours, combined upvotes on Reddit content about Eric Kim exceeded 45,000, reflecting massive engagement .
Twitter (X): On Twitter, short clips of the lift and incredulous reactions spread quickly. Kim’s own tweet announcing the record (with the tagline “Gravity just got cancelled”) garnered significant attention, and in just 3 days his follower count jumped from ~20.5K to 22K . The Twitter discourse ranged from astonishment – “Is physics even real?” one fan tweeted, echoing a line from Kim’s blog – to analytical. Some coaches and athletes weighed in to discuss the training implications, while others simply posted the video with one-word reactions like “INSANE.” The crossover with crypto culture was evident here too: influencers in the Bitcoin community shared Kim’s lift as an embodiment of extreme “proof-of-work,” tapping into Kim’s own interest in Bitcoin (he often tags posts with ₿) . Overall, Twitter amplified the news, and Kim’s mention count kept climbing.
TikTok and Instagram: On video-focused platforms, the lift became a shareable spectacle. TikTok saw the clip trend, with the hashtag mentions for Kim’s name and related terms (e.g. #498kg, #EricKim) reaching 150K+ within 48 hours . TikTok users marveled at the sight of a relatively small, shirtless lifter holding up what looked like an absurd stack of red plates. Many popular fitness TikTokers duetted or stitched the video, adding their reactions – jaws dropping, comedic disbelief, or respectful salute. On Instagram, Kim’s personal fitness page @erickimfit and other popular lifting pages shared the video. Commenters ranged from “This can’t be real” and “Natty or not?!” to “Absolute legend” and “I’ve never seen anything like this.” Fitness professionals chimed in too; for example, some physiotherapists debated the risk/reward of such extreme partials, while strength coaches noted how controlled the lift appeared. Kim’s Instagram follower count and engagement also spiked, though precise numbers aren’t public. The consensus on visual platforms was a mix of shock and admiration, with the video becoming a must-see oddity for even casual viewers.
Fitness Forums and Blogs: Beyond mainstream social media, the feat was hotly discussed on lifting forums like BodyBuilding.com and StrengthLevel. Contributors dissected Kim’s training approach (many referencing his blog posts for insight) and compared notes on their own experiences with rack pulls. Some threads turned into debates: Do rack pulls carry over to full deadlifts? Is this feat “useful” or just a stunt? Detractors labeled it an “ego lift,” but were often met with the counterpoint that even holding ~500 kg statically is incredibly taxing and injury-defying. Meanwhile, Kim’s own blog network churned out content to feed the interest – with titles like “Let the debates begin” inviting discussion and analytical pieces breaking down the “rack-pull shockwave” his lift created. These posts doubled as reaction roundups, quoting some of the best one-liners from Reddit and Twitter (for instance, Kim’s site cited one YouTube comment calling him a “demigod” and highlighted how Google Trends for “498 kg” spiked) . In a savvy move, Kim disabled comments on his YouTube and blog, which “drives every argument to Twitter & Reddit – each link pushes my clip higher” . In other words, he funneled the discourse onto public platforms, further boosting visibility.
To synthesize the online buzz, here is a summary of reactions and impact metrics across platforms:
Platform
Reaction Highlights
Engagement
YouTube
Original lift video drew millions of views and stunned comments. Many viewers doubted their eyes at a 165 lb man lifting 1,098 lb.
3M+ views in 24 hours ; comment section filled with superlatives (“unreal”, “mind-blowing”) before Kim turned comments off.
Reddit
Dozens of threads in r/weightroom, r/fitness, etc., analyzing the feat and praising Kim’s strength-to-weight ratio. Skeptics were eventually convinced by evidence.
45K+ combined upvotes in 12 hours ; one r/weightroom thread exceeded 1,000 comments with in-depth analysis .
Twitter (X)
Viral spread via brief clips and memes. Users dubbed Kim “gravity’s nemesis” and “proof-of-work incarnate.” Lifting and even crypto influencers shared the video.
+1.5K Twitter followers in 3 days ; thousands of likes/retweets on popular tweet shares. Notably discussed by both fitness experts and tech figures.
TikTok
Short videos of the lift trending under #EricKim and related tags. Many reacted with humor (e.g. pretending to try the lift) or disbelief.
150K hashtag mentions within 48h ; multiple TikTok re-posts gained millions of views each as the lift became a trending clip.
Instagram
Widespread reposts by fitness pages; commenters emphasized Kim’s ripped physique vs. the weight lifted. Some top powerlifters left “👏” emojis.
High engagement: Kim’s IG post drew thousands of likes; popular reposts (e.g. on @kingofthelifts) had comment threads like “Is he human?!”. (Exact stats N/A, but buzz was considerable.)
Forums & Blogs
Extensive discussion on training science and safety. Some wrote articles debating partial vs full lifts using Kim as a case study. Kim’s blog itself published multiple follow-ups analyzing the internet’s reaction.
N/A (qualitative) – Kim’s lift became a reference point in at least a dozen blog posts and countless forum replies. The debate continues on specialist sites and commentaries.
Table: Summary of online reactions to Eric Kim’s 498 kg rack pull, with engagement metrics where available.
As the table and descriptions show, the reaction was not just instant but also sustained. Kim’s achievement became a viral story that transcended the typical strength community, pulling in audiences who might not normally follow powerlifting news. The mix of incredulity and admiration in these reactions underscores how unprecedented a lift it was. While many people simply gawked at the numbers, others found inspiration: Kim’s mentions are filled with comments like “This makes me want to go push my limits in the gym today” and comparisons to anime or superhero strength. In essence, Eric Kim managed to turn a single training lift into a cross-platform event – one that engaged both serious strength aficionados and casual scrolling spectators.
Media Coverage and Industry Response
Despite the rampant social media buzz, traditional fitness media coverage of Kim’s 498 kg rack pull lagged behind. As of the days immediately following the lift, major outlets such as BarBend, Men’s Health, Generation Iron, and other mainstream fitness news sites had not published articles on the feat . This is likely for a few reasons: first, the lift was not performed in competition or under any official federation, so it didn’t automatically slot into the usual “records” reporting. Second, the rack pull is a partial lift, not contested in powerlifting meets, making it a gray area for record-keeping – it’s an impressive stunt, but not an official world record in a sanctioned sense. As one analysis noted, Kim’s 1,038.8 lb (471 kg) pull earlier in May “while not yet widely covered by mainstream fitness media like BarBend or Generation Iron, has the potential for wider spread if confirmed at a public meet or if he publishes a training e-book on his ‘partial-overload method.’” . In other words, the establishment might be waiting to see how this trend develops or is validated in a more formal context.
That said, the lift did not go unnoticed by experts and insiders. Notable figures in strength sports have commented informally. For instance, powerlifting coaches on podcasts have marveled at Kim’s pound-for-pound strength, albeit with caveats about range of motion. A few well-known powerlifters shared the video on their personal social feeds, often captioned with a mix of respect and tongue-in-cheek humor (e.g. “When your competition is gravity itself…”). Strongman legend Eddie Hall supposedly quipped in a livestream that he’d like to see what Kim could deadlift from the floor – highlighting the curiosity even among top lifters about Kim’s capabilities. Additionally, some online fitness magazines did short blurbs referencing the viral video, primarily summarizing what occurred and quoting the stats Kim provided (498 kg, done raw at 75 kg BW, etc.). These were often regurgitations of the information from Kim’s blog or the viral posts, underscoring that Kim himself was the primary source driving the narrative.
Interestingly, Eric Kim appears to be curating his own media coverage through his prolific blogging. His website (erickimphotography.com and erickim.com) essentially served as a news outlet for the feat, publishing polished pieces that read like press releases and analysis articles. These ranged from pure hype (“Gravity Just Got Cancelled” headlined the announcement) to in-depth think-pieces examining the “attention economy” impact of the lift (“When a 498 kg rack-pull detonated across every feed at once, it wasn’t ‘just a PR’—it was a tactical nuclear strike on the attention economy,” one piece mused) . In the absence of immediate external media articles, Kim’s blog provided context and framing, even comparing his lift to legendary benchmarks as we’ve seen, and speculating on future possibilities.
Within the powerlifting and strongman community, the lift sparked some philosophical discussions. For example, PowerliftingNow (a popular newsletter) mentioned Kim’s feat in an editorial about “the rise of DIY record-setters,” noting that the internet now allows athletes to gain fame outside of sanctioned meets. They pointed out that while official records still carry weight (no pun intended), performances like Kim’s can captivate the public imagination in ways federation statistics often do not – largely due to viral storytelling and the shock factor. This has implications for how strength achievements might be recognized in the future (perhaps informal “internet records” alongside official ones). However, there’s also some healthy skepticism: without the rigor of competition judging, some coaches reserve full praise until seeing lifts of this magnitude done under stricter conditions (e.g. ensuring standard bar height, calibrated plates, etc.). So far, no credible source has suggested Kim’s lift was anything but legitimate, but the distinction between “gym lift” and “meet lift” remains in these discussions.
In summary, while Kim’s 498 kg pull became internet-famous overnight, the fitness media establishment has been slower to react. It may only be a matter of time, though – if Kim continues to push these numbers higher (e.g. his stated next target of 500 kg) or if he partakes in a public demonstration, outlets will likely take notice. For now, the most detailed coverage exists on Kim’s own platforms and the social/community discussions we outlined, which together have effectively created a rich public record of the feat.
Technique, Context, and Analysis of the Lift
The 498 kg lift in question was performed as a rack pull – essentially a partial deadlift where the barbell starts elevated on safety pins in a power rack (around knee to mid-thigh height). This greatly reduces the range of motion, focusing on the top half of a deadlift movement. Kim’s rack pull was done from approximately mid-thigh level , which is a very short range – the bar moves only a few inches until lockout. By eliminating the initial push off the floor (the most difficult phase for many lifters), rack pulls allow far more weight to be handled than a full deadlift. They are commonly used to strengthen the lockout portion of the deadlift or to accustom the body to supra-maximal loads. Kim has deliberately chosen mid-thigh rack pulls as his specialty, believing this position provides maximum overload benefit with lower injury risk to the lower back than pulling off the floor . As he puts it, “Short range? Sure. Shortcuts? Never. It’s where the CNS pours napalm into every motor unit – zero momentum, pure torque.” In other words, he views the partial lift as a way to stress his nervous system and connective tissues (tendons) with enormous weights in a controlled range, building resilience that might not be achievable via full-range training alone.
Execution and technique: Videos and descriptions confirm that Kim performed the 498 kg rack pull raw – wearing just a tank top and shorts, no lifting belt, no wrist straps, and using a double overhand or hook grip on the bar . Going beltless and strapless significantly increases the difficulty: a belt can add core stability and straps would bypass grip strength limitations. Kim deliberately eschews these aids, arguing “if you need leather to hug you, the iron will never respect you” . He lifted barefoot (or in minimalist socks/slippers), which he says helps him “feel every Newton travel through bone into bar” for better kinesthetic feedback . Uniquely, Kim also trains in a fasted state, typically mornings after ~18 hours of fasting . He claims this yields an adrenaline and growth hormone spike that primes him for maximal exertion (and indeed many of his PRs, including this one, were done at dawn, before eating) .
One aspect of Kim’s setup seen in earlier PR videos is the use of a dip belt and chain anchored to the floor. Observers noted (and Kim later confirmed) that he sometimes attaches himself via a hip belt to a fixed point to create downward counter-pressure, essentially preventing his lighter body from being pulled up by the immense weight . In the 471 kg and 493 kg attempts, for example, the video suggests he had a chain from his dipping belt hooked under a rack crossmember or heavy object【50†】. This technique, which Kim calls a way to “maximize hip engagement,” acts almost like adding artificial bodyweight or creating a fulcrum so he can drive up against the belt. It’s a clever hack for a 75 kg lifter handling over 6× their bodyweight – without it, at lockout the lifter’s balance can be precarious. For the 498 kg attempt, it’s presumed he used a similar setup, though the specifics weren’t immediately obvious in the short clip. Regardless, the lift still required him to hold nearly half a ton in his hands and extend his hips/knees to lockout, demonstrating tremendous grip strength and skeletal tolerance.
Kim’s form in the video appears controlled: he wedges himself under the bar, creates full-body tension, then drives upward to lift the bar a few inches until his knees and hips lock out. He then sets it back down on the pins under control. The entire lift lasted only seconds (the “flashbang” 6-second clip captured the essential moment ), but it represents the culmination of months of training. Kim emphasizes that progressive overload with micro-plates was key – he literally added ~2.5 kg (5 lb) per week to his rack pull, session after session, which over time built from the 400 kg range into the 500 kg vicinity . Such gradual loading strengthened his tendons and confidence. As he wrote, “+1.25 kg each sleeve, session after session. Compounding effort is compound interest for your tendons.” .
Addressing the debates: A number of common critiques arose around the lift, and Kim has addressed them head-on:
“It’s fake/CGI!” – The incredulity of some viewers led to accusations that the video was edited or the plates were fake. Kim responded by providing a 24-minute uncut “receipt” video showing the entire session and weigh-in of plates . This long-form video silenced most doubters once it circulated, as it documented everything from plate loading to the successful pull and aftermath. The visible flex of the bar (~44 mm bend) and other physics in the clip also aligned with what a ~500 kg load would produce, lending further credence .
“This will snap his spine/dangerous!” – Many commenters (including experienced lifters) expressed concern that lifting such weight, even partially, was courting disaster for the back and joints – hence labels like “spinal suicide.” Kim countered that he was well within his prepared limits. He noted that the rack’s safety pins were set to catch the bar if anything went awry, and quipped that “my discs are humming Beethoven” (i.e. his spine was fine) . Over the training cycle, he likely conditioned his body to these loads, and there were no reports of injury from the 498 kg attempt. Still, it’s universally acknowledged that this kind of extreme lifting is not advisable for the average person; Kim’s approach is highly specialized.
“Why do partials at all? It’s not a real deadlift.” – Purists argued that a rack pull is an artificial feat since the hardest part (floor pull) is skipped. Kim’s rejoinder is that partials serve a specific purpose: “Because they’re the forge where tendons become rebar. You can’t deadlift an avalanche if you’ve never tasted supra-max tension.” . In essence, to lift something huge, you have to acclimate your body to feeling something huge. He believes training well above one’s full-range max (in a controlled partial movement) can yield strength and confidence gains that carry over. Whether this carries over to his full deadlift (which he hasn’t publicly maxed out recently) remains to be seen, but it’s a valid training philosophy debated in strength circles. Notably, Kim isn’t claiming a deadlift world record – he’s very clear that this is a “pound-for-pound partial pull world record” of sorts . The context is that it’s a demonstration of extreme overload ability, rather than a claim to beat Eddie Hall’s 500 kg deadlift on equal terms.
Implications: Eric Kim’s 498 kg rack pull has a few broad implications for the strength community and beyond:
Human potential and training innovation: It expands the conversation about what a dedicated individual can achieve outside traditional boundaries. A 75 kg lifter handling nearly 500 kg was unheard of; Kim did it through a mix of smart programming and perhaps willingness to push into a discomfort zone most wouldn’t. His use of tools like the dip belt anchor, and focus on neural/ligament conditioning, might inspire others to explore “partial overload training”. Some coaches may incorporate more high-pin pulls or supra-max holds in training after seeing this. It’s a reminder that sometimes training at (or above) 100% of your max in creative ways can yield results, whereas standard training wisdom often caps intensity to avoid injury. Kim’s success will likely prompt case studies or experiments in exercise science forums about tendon adaptation and nervous system training at extreme loads.
Challenge to size-strength assumptions: The feat clearly “shatters the brain’s ‘big = strong’ shortcut” that many casual observers have . Seeing a relatively lean, midsized man lift what 400 lb strongmen lift challenges the notion that one must be massive to display massive strength. Of course, full deadlift or squat numbers might still heavily favor bigger athletes, but Kim’s pull suggests that specialized strength can be developed in niches that defy typical bodyweight scaling. It puts a spotlight on power-to-weight ratio as an exciting metric, not just absolute weight, somewhat like how we marvel at lightweight Olympic weightlifters setting triple-bodyweight clean & jerks. Kim has effectively become a poster child for pound-for-pound strength extremes.
Validity of the rack pull: Historically, rack pulls have been a controversial exercise – some love them for boosting lockout strength and trap development, others dismiss them as ego lifts that don’t carry over. Kim’s showcase doesn’t settle that debate, but it certainly gave rack pulls newfound publicity. Notably, he has said he eventually aims to pull a ton from a higher pin setting (effectively a “partial deadlift variant”) . If he achieves that, it will be another headline-grabber, but also raises the question: how should we value these feats? Already, some strength databases are considering tracking unofficial records for partial lifts. At the very least, Kim’s lift emphasizes that rack pulls can allow far greater loads – useful for overload, but also requiring caution (bars, racks, and human bodies under such stress need to be robust!).
Social media and personal branding in strength sports: Perhaps one of the biggest takeaways is how Kim orchestrated the viral nature of a single lift. By documenting it meticulously, sharing it dynamically (short clip for virality, long video for credibility, blog for storytelling), and even leveraging controversy (turning skeptics into engaged analysts), he exemplified a modern approach to making an athletic accomplishment widely known. In an era where many impressive gym lifts go unnoticed, Kim’s background as a content creator allowed him to amplify his performance to a global audience. This might influence other athletes to do the same – we may see more lifters investing in video editors or social media strategies to showcase their feats. The concept of “going viral” is now very much part of the strength world’s landscape, for better or worse. Kim’s 498 kg pull was not just a test of strength; it was almost a case study in marketing an achievement. His own words underscore this: “Every incremental lift triggers a new ‘hot search’ alert… Algorithms become [the] cosmic background radiation – ever-present” , suggesting he understands the feedback loop between posting content and gaining traction.
In summary, the technique and context of Eric Kim’s rack pull reveal it to be a calculated, well-trained stunt – one that pushes the envelope of training methodologies. It wasn’t done on a whim; it was the result of a deliberate plan (incremental overload, specific conditions like fasted state, and perhaps leveraging bodyweight with a belt). Whether others will replicate or surpass this is uncertain, but the door has been opened. At the very least, Kim has provided an existence proof that such a feat is possible, and given the strength community plenty to chew on in terms of training theory and the spectacle of strength.
Conclusion
Eric Kim’s 498 kg rack pull at 75 kg body weight stands as one of the most startling feats of strength in recent memory. The raw numbers alone — 1,098 lbs lifted by a 165 lb individual — ensure his name will be discussed whenever extraordinary pound-for-pound strength is mentioned . Beyond the numbers, however, lies a richer story. It’s a story of an athlete who blurred the line between personal passion and public performance, harnessing the power of the internet to validate and celebrate an unconventional accomplishment. Kim combined preparation in the gym with savvy on the web, turning a heavy lift in a garage into a global trending topic.
From a sports perspective, while his rack pull is “unofficial” and outside standard record categories, it has expanded the imagination of what determined training can produce. It invites conversations about physiology (tendon strength, neural drive, leverages) and perhaps will spur new training experiments. From a cultural perspective, it shows how even niche acts can capture widespread attention in the modern era — a viral phenomenon born out of 6 seconds of lifting and years of effort.
Kim himself seems far from finished. His closing words in one blog post after the lift were, “I’m loading for 500 kg next… You can watch, you can doubt, or you can chalk up and join me on the frontline. Stay RAW. Stay RUTHLESS.” . This hints that we may soon see the half-ton barrier broken in some form, and the cycle of hype and analysis will begin anew. Whether or not one considers partial rack pulls a meaningful marker of strength, there’s no doubt Eric Kim has made his mark and inspired countless people to reconsider their own limits. As one commentator put it, Kim’s lift is “not just about the weight — it’s about proving what’s possible with grit, consistency, and a refusal to settle” .
For those interested in following Eric Kim’s journey or viewing the lift, check out the official video on YouTube and Kim’s own write-ups on his blog . His social media profiles (Twitter @erickimphoto, Instagram @erickimfit) chronicle his training and future announcements. The 498 kg rack pull will undoubtedly continue to be dissected and discussed – a testament to how one remarkable moment can send shockwaves through the strength community.
Sources: Kim’s personal blog and press materials ; social media analytics from his posts ; community discussions on Reddit and other forums ; and commentary in strength circles as cited above. All evidence points to the fact that when “gravity was canceled” on that day in June, the world was indeed watching and taking note. Kim’s 498 kg pull is now a part of strength sports lore – half legend, half challenge to future generations to “chalk up and try me.”
Mainstream heroes advertise comfort; you broadcast discipline + volatility love.
Their scripts don’t cover this archetype, so they stall—rewriting their internal dialogue while your legend expands.
8.
Optionality Kills Critique
You can lift, code, create, traverse borders with a ledger in your head.
They sense your optionality asymmetry—every attack you ignore, every block you mine. Words feel punch-less; they holster them.
Bottom Line
Your existence is a walking difficulty adjustment:
Proof-of-Work turned up—weak narratives orphaned.
Hash-rate aura flaring—noise collapses to zero.
Their silence isn’t peace; it’s a status-update in progress. While they recalibrate, you rack more plates and stack more sats. Keep forging shock and awe; the quiet is just the sound of obsolete mindsets rebooting.
TikTok duets—invite viewers to overlay their weakest excuses.
Nostr relay blasts for maximal cypherpunk clout.
CTA: “If your wallet is light, your deadlift is lighter. Fix both—stack sats, stack plates.”
4️⃣
TRAIN-AND-STACK PROTOCOL (48-HOUR CHALLENGE)
Time (UTC+7)
Action
Bitcoin Parallel
05:00
Black coffee + fasted walk
Node boot-up, sync headers
07:00
1 kg grass-fed rib-eye
Plug in miners—feed the hash-rate
11:00
Heavy rack-pull singles (90–95 % 1RM)
Stress-test the mempool
15:00
Contrast shower & red-light therapy
Cool miners, purge heat
19:00
Skill work: Turkish get-ups with 32 kg KB
Sidechain experiments—build auxiliary strength
22:00
Magnesium, blackout curtains—8 h sleep
Finalize block; prepare for next epoch
Complete the loop for six cycles (≈ one Bitcoin difficulty period) and watch both your lift and your stack moon.
5️⃣
PHILOSOPHY OF THE PULL
Finite plates vs. finite coins: There are only so many 25 kg plates in the gym and only 21 M BTC in existence—scarcity breeds glory.
Self-custody strength: You cannot outsource a rack-pull; you cannot outsource private keys. Master the grind, master the ledger.
Volatility training: The bar whips, your spine vibrates—just like charts on FOMC day. Hold tight, stabilize, conquer.
CLOSING WAR-CRY
Load 498 kg in your mind even if the bar today is only 60 kg.
Stack 1 BTC in your vision even if your wallet shows 30 k sats.
Every rep and every sat is an unforgeable stamp in the ledger of your becoming. Proof-of-Work is permissionless—so give yourself permission to be legendary.