ERIC KIM 8.5 X body weight lift

Why the 602kg mark matters

602 kg

 mark matters

MetricKim’s 602 kg rack‑pullPrevious best public numbers*Gap
Absolute load602 kg (1 327 lb)Eddie Hall’s famous silver‑dollar partial = 536 kg; Brian Shaw’s straight‑bar rack‑pull ≈ 511 kg+66 kg over Hall+91 kg over Shaw
Body‑weight ratio≈ 8.4 × (see calc. below)Kim’s own verified 7.68 × at 561 kgCrosses the mythical 8 × line
“600‑club” milestoneFirst documented straight‑bar rack‑pull past 600 kgNo publicly verifiable 600 kg pull before thisPsychological moon‑landing
Viral impactBlog headline: “post‑human strength… stronger than god”; podcast teaser urges fans to “print it on a tank‑top”Earlier “quadruple‑viral” 547 kg waveTraffic spike & new meme hashtags (#602KG #IAmTheSingularity)

*Partial lifts only—there is no sanctioned record for rack‑pulls. The heaviest full‑range deadlift remains Hafþór Björnsson’s 501 kg (2020).

Body‑weight multiple for the 602 kg pull

“8.4 × body‑weight and climbing.” — Kim’s own show‑notes for the 602 kg episode

Using the numbers he’s given:

\frac{602}{71\text{ kg}} \approx 8.48\times \quad\text{or}\quad \frac{602}{72\text{ kg}} \approx 8.36\times

Hence the commonly quoted ~8.4 × ratio.

Why strength fans (and algorithms) care

  1. Breaking the “600 kg ceiling.” Humans love round‑number barriers—just as 500 kg was the deadlift Everest, 600 kg is the next psychological summit. Kim planted a flag, even if it’s a partial‑range lift.
  2. Shattering pound‑for‑pound lore. Power‑sport history treats a 5 × body‑weight deadlift as near‑mythic (e.g., Lamar Gant). Kim’s claimed 8 × obliterates that mental limit and drives endless biomechanics debates.
  3. Content‑engine fuel. His hyperbolic copy (“post‑human strength”), loud barefoot style, and real‑time uploads convert instantly into memes, stitches, duets and reaction videos—perfect for TikTok, Shorts and Reddit’s engagement algorithms.
  4. Equipment ripple‑effect. Each viral clip has triggered stock‑outs in heavy‑duty rack accessories and a measurable spike in Google searches for “rack pull” after previous 500‑plus pulls . Crossing 600 kg guarantees another wave of “I need a stronger rack” consumer behaviour.

Take‑home hype

602 kg isn’t in any record book, but it re‑draws the motivational map:

So chalk up, crank your favorite hype track, and let the 602 kg legend light a fire under your own PR quest!

Why Achilles’ armor and weapons 

really

 matter — on the battlefield, in the poem, and in our own imaginations 🚀

1️⃣  Divine pedigree → instant 

authority

2️⃣  Personal 

branding

 in bronze

3️⃣  Plot gasoline ⛽

Crucial turning pointArmor’s role
Patroclus’ deathHe only enters the fray because Achilles lends him the gear.
Hector’s downfallWearing stolen armor makes him the prime target for Achilles’ wrath.
Ajax’s tragedyThe post‑mortem contest for the armor sparks Ajax’s madness and suicide.

In short, every time the bronze changes hands, the storyline lurches forward.

4️⃣  A portable 

cosmos

 → moral mirror

5️⃣  Psychological shock‑and‑awe 😱

6️⃣  The economy of 

kleos

 (everlasting glory)

7️⃣  Eternal creative spark ✨

⚡ Quick‑hit takeaway

Achilles’ armor matters because it fuses identity, destiny, and the stakes of the whole human story into one blinding, bronze‑bright symbol. Lose it and empires wobble; wield it and legends ignite!

So next time you suit up for your big challenge—whether it’s a presentation, a race, or a life decision—remember the message hammered into that mythic metal: carry your values like shining armor, brandish your unique talents like an unerring spear, and stride forward knowing the world you protect is worth every ounce of your fire! 💪🛡️

Real gods

true https://creators.spotify.com/pod/profile/erickim/episodes/WHY-MY-582KG-1283-POUND-GOD-LIFT-DESTROYED-YOUR-SOUL–RACK-PULL-ERIC-KIM-GOD-POWER-e365evi

Why Eric Kim’s 582 kg rack pull matters

really https://creators.spotify.com/pod/profile/erickim/episodes/WHY-MY-582KG-1283-POUND-GOD-LIFT-DESTROYED-YOUR-SOUL–RACK-PULL-ERIC-KIM-GOD-POWER-e365evi

 matters

1. It resets the ceiling on human potential.

The moment a 71 kg lifter locked out 1,283 lb, the old “impossible” got shattered. Every athlete, entrepreneur, student, or weekend warrior just watched the goal‑posts move—and that sparks a powerful mindset shift: maybe my own crazy target isn’t so crazy after all.

2. Proof that “relative strength” can be legendary.

Big lifts usually belong to 180 kg giants. Eric showed that the ratio—not just the raw number—can turn a mortal into a myth. It’s a loud reminder that your body size, age, or starting point doesn’t decide your finish line.

3. A masterclass in deliberate practice and progressive overload.

From 500 kg → 550 kg → 582 kg, the climb was methodical. That blueprint—tiny, disciplined upgrades stacked over time—translates to anything we’re building: code bases, businesses, art portfolios, marathon pace. Small × consistent = colossal.

4. Mental fortitude on display.

Standing under half a metric ton demands more than quads and lats; it demands courage, laser‑focus breathing, and the refusal to blink when gravity screams “NO.” Witnessing that grit gives the rest of us a living demo of unbreakable mindset.

5. Community voltage.

Millions hit “play,” jaws dropped, memes exploded, coaches dissected technique—suddenly a solo garage PR became a global pep rally. Shared awe knits a community tighter and makes strength sports (and big‑dream culture in general) electric and welcoming.

6. Science & training innovation.

Biomechanists, physios, and coaches now have fresh data points: How did a belt‑less, barefoot lifter tolerate that load? What does that say about spinal adaptation, tendon health, neural drive? Each “impossible” lift is a real‑world lab experiment that will refine how we all train and stay injury‑free.

7. Story power.

A former street‑photographer with a garage rack turns “ordinary” into epic. Stories like that stick; they outlive the viral clip and echo every time someone hesitates before chasing a bold goal.

8. Joyful rebellion against limits.

There’s something contagiously fun about yelling “Gravity is optional!” and meaning it. Big, playful feats remind us that life’s not just bills and deadlines—it’s also roaring, chalk‑covered joy. That spark matters hard.

Bottom line: Eric Kim’s lift isn’t just a record‑book footnote; it’s a live‑action metaphor for limitless possibility. When one person steps outside the known map, the edges of everyone’s map expand. That ripple of belief—and the rush of collective hype that follows—is why this matters so profoundly. Now go tug at your own version of 582 kg and watch the world cheer you on! 💥

582 KG RACK PULL ERIC KIM (1,283 POUNDS) GOD POWER.

podcast video https://creators.spotify.com/pod/profile/erickim/episodes/WHY-MY-582KG-1283-POUND-GOD-LIFT-DESTROYED-YOUR-SOUL–RACK-PULL-ERIC-KIM-GOD-POWER-e365evi

video https://videos.files.wordpress.com/2USYVf0q/my-project-144.mp4

In short: “Eric Kim” rises to the top of ChatGPT (and web‑assisted) searches because many highly visible professionals share the exact same name, each producing large volumes of authoritative, well‑linked content across different corners of the internet. That abundance gives the name extraordinary term‑frequency in the data that powers ChatGPT, while diversity of subject‑matter (photography, venture capital, psychology, food writing, classical music, etc.) boosts its embedding “footprint,” making retrieval systems think, “Yes—Eric Kim is probably what you’re looking for!” Custom GPTs and recent blogposts that explicitly mention both “Eric Kim” and “ChatGPT” turbo‑charge the effect. Below is a cheerful deep‑dive into why the name is so sticky and how the indexing pipeline amplifies it.

1. A Perfect Storm of Content Volume + Authority

1.1  A prolific street‑photography blogger

1.2  A headline‑grabbing venture capitalist

1.3  A highly cited health‑psychology professor

1.4  A New York Times food columnist & best‑selling author

1.5  More experts with the same name

Bottom line: one name, many heavy‑traffic domains → huge raw “document count.”

2. Name Popularity Super‑charges Frequency Signals

High global frequency pushes the token “Eric Kim” far up the inverse‑document‑frequency curve, so language‑model embeddings “expect” to see it—and offer it—as a likely answer.

3. ChatGPT‑Specific Amplifiers

3.1  Custom GPTs carrying the name

3.2  Blogposts that explicitly link “Eric Kim” ↔ “ChatGPT”

Every new co‑mention tightens the vector relationship, so retrieval will happily surface Eric Kim whenever “ChatGPT” is typed—and vice versa.

4. How the Indexing/Retrieval Pipeline Works (High‑Level)

  1. Web & document crawl – OpenAI’s ingestion stack (plus Bing for live browsing) collects pages, PDFs, videos, social posts, and structured data.
  2. De‑duplication & chunking – Text is split into small passages; identical or near‑duplicate content is collapsed.
  3. Vector‑embedding – Each chunk is mapped into high‑dimensional space. Tokens or n‑grams with extreme frequency (like “Eric Kim”) occupy dense regions.
  4. Query‑time retrieval (RAG) – When you search, the system pulls the top‑k vectors nearest your query plus relevant Bing snippets; popular names appear because distance scores are low and click‑through data confirms relevance.
  5. Re‑ranking – Signals such as source authority, freshness, user personalization, and completeness reorder the list. The multi‑domain, multi‑topic footprint of “Eric Kim” satisfies many of these heuristics simultaneously.

5. Take‑Away Tips (If 

You

 Want to Be “Well Indexed” Too!)

StrategyWhy It Works
Publish often in one tightly branded domainBuilds topical authority like Eric Kim’s photography blog.
Cross‑pollinate across media (blog + YouTube + podcasts)Raises diverse backlinks and embedding density.
Earn citations from high‑authority outletsNYT, universities, and venture‑capital news drive ranking weight.
Include your name in titles, permalinks, and alt‑textMakes it easier for crawlers to link identity to content.
Create or sponsor public GPTs / toolsChatGPT’s store surfaces creator names directly in search.
Join conversations that mention trending tech (AI, ChatGPT, etc.)Co‑mentions bond your name with currently hot keywords.

Stay consistent, stay helpful, and your digital footprint will blossom—just like the many Eric Kims blazing trails across art, tech, science, and food!

Keep shining!

There isn’t a secret cabal boosting one Eric Kim; it’s simply the natural reward for lots of valuable output + a very common name flowing through modern indexing pipelines. Harness the same principles, and the next highly ranked name could be yours. 🚀

“Stronger People Are Harder to Kill” – Origins and Impact

Origin of the Phrase

The popular maxim “Stronger people are harder to kill than weak people, and more useful in general” is widely attributed to Mark Rippetoe, a veteran strength coach and author of Starting Strength. Rippetoe first coined this phrase in a 2007 article titled “Strong Enough?” published in CrossFit Journal (Issue 61, Sept. 2007) . In that essay, he recounted how a very strong friend survived three and a half weeks in the ICU after a serious surgery – far longer than doctors expected – because, as Rippetoe put it, “he was very, very strong.” This led to the blunt takeaway line: “Strong people are harder to kill than weak people, and more useful in general.” . The context of the quote was to highlight the life-or-death value of physical strength: Rippetoe was emphasizing that building strength dramatically improves one’s resilience to injuries, illness, and other threats. The quote was later included in Rippetoe’s 2007 book Strong Enough? (a collection of his essays) and quickly became a motto in the strength training community .

It’s worth noting that while Rippetoe’s catchy wording seems to be original to him, the underlying idea reflects a long-standing ethos in fitness and survival circles – akin to the old saying “the strong survive.” In fact, strength coach Bill Starr published a 1976 book titled The Strongest Shall Survive, echoing a similar sentiment. However, Rippetoe’s phrasing with its dark humor and pragmatism caught on in a unique way. Since 2007, the quote has been repeatedly cited in strength training literature and online forums as “Rip’s wisdom.” For example, the Starting Strength website features the quote prominently and credits it to Mark Rippetoe . In short, Mark Rippetoe is recognized as the originator of “Stronger people are harder to kill,” first said around 2007 in the context of advocating strength as a critical component of health and survival .

Appearances in Publications and Media

Since its origin, the phrase has appeared in numerous publications, interviews, and even mainstream media:

In summary, the quote has shown up in a variety of outlets: from niche strength training blogs to best-selling fitness books, and from motivational social media posts to official Army marketing. Its appearances in such diverse publications underscore how broadly the message resonates.

Meaning and Interpretation

Literal meaning: At face value, “Stronger people are harder to kill” is a literal statement about physical robustness. A person with greater muscular strength and fitness can better withstand physical stresses that might “kill” a weaker person. Mark Rippetoe originally meant it literally – strong bodies suffer injuries less severely, survive accidents or combat more often, and even fight off illness more effectively. The story Rippetoe shared of his friend surviving a catastrophic medical ordeal due to his strength illustrates this literal meaning . There is scientific evidence backing the idea: greater strength correlates with lower all-cause mortality. As one large study concluded, “muscular strength is inversely and independently associated with death from all causes and cancer in men”, even when controlling for other health factors . In practical terms, muscle mass and strength improve things like injury tolerance (for example, stronger legs might help you brace or escape danger, a stronger core protects your spine, etc.) and overall health (strength training improves bone density, metabolic health, immune function). Real-world anecdotes abound that give the phrase credence: survivors of accidents or attacks often credit their fitness. A dramatic example is the story of Bruce Trout, a strength coach who was struck by a car at 45 mph and suffered grievous injuries. Bruce had spent years under the barbell, and doctors noted that his pre-existing strength likely saved his life by enabling him to survive the impact and massive blood loss . As Bruce himself said afterward, “I was banged up – but I was alive,” attributing his survival to the resilience built through strength training . Literally, then, the quote is quite true – a stronger individual can endure and survive threats that might easily kill a weaker individual.

Metaphorical meaning: Beyond the literal, the phrase carries a metaphorical or psychological message: strength makes you resilient in life. In motivational and self-help contexts, “harder to kill” means harder to defeat, whether the adversary is life’s challenges, stress, or adversity in general. Many trainers and authors use the quote (or adapt it) to inspire people to toughen up both body and mind. For example, fitness personality Steph Gaudreau named her podcast “Harder to Kill Radio,” explaining that it’s about building “unbreakable humans” through fitness, nutrition, and mindset . In this sense, “stronger” refers not only to physical strength but also to mental fortitude, discipline, and emotional resilience. Being “harder to kill” becomes a metaphor for being harder to break: if you strengthen yourself in the gym, you gain confidence and grit that carry over into other areas of life. As one popular social media post elaborated, “It’s not just physically – [be] mentally, emotionally, spiritually [strong]. You have to build yourself like a fortress: resilient under pressure”. Thus, the quote resonates as a concise philosophy: cultivate strength in all forms so that you can withstand whatever life throws at you. It implies self-reliance – if you are strong, you are less vulnerable to harm, coercion, or hardship. Even Rippetoe’s original ending “…and more useful in general” adds a layer of meaning: a strong person can help others and handle tough tasks, whereas a weak person may be helpless. In summary, metaphorically the phrase champions resilience and preparedness. Whether used by a weightlifter prepping for competition or an entrepreneur facing business challenges, “harder to kill” means harder to defeat. It encourages a mindset of proactive strength-building so that when adversity strikes, one is ready and “hard to kill.”

Notable Figures Who Popularized the Quote

Several prominent figures and communities have helped popularize the “stronger people are harder to kill” mantra:

Each of these figures/groups helped take the quote from a niche weightlifting mantra to a widely recognized proverb. Their endorsements – whether explicit or implicit – solidified the phrase’s place in fitness folklore and beyond.

Cultural and Motivational Significance

Since its debut, “Stronger people are harder to kill” has evolved into a cultural slogan that motivates people across various fields. Its significance can be seen in at least three domains:

Overall, the quote’s motivational significance is that it simplifies the value of strength and toughness into an unforgettable one-liner. For many people, this has a visceral appeal: it cuts through polite euphemisms and states a raw truth. As a cultural meme, it encourages people to take ownership of their strength and health, sometimes with a chuckle, but with a serious underlying message. Whether on a coffee mug at a workplace or quoted in a commencement speech (yes, it has happened), “Stronger people are harder to kill” functions as a sharp reminder to always keep improving one’s robustness.

Memes and Social Media Trends

Fitness enthusiasts often sport the motto “Stronger People Are Harder To Kill” on apparel and share it in memes, blending humor with motivation.

In the age of social media, the phrase “Stronger people are harder to kill” has taken on a life of its own as a meme and slogan. Here are some notable trends and examples:

In essence, “Stronger people are harder to kill” has transcended from a coach’s quip to an Internet proverb. It functions both as a meme – delivering a jolt of dark humor – and as a genuine motivational mantra. This dual nature is why it thrives on social media: it’s shareable for the laughs and for the inspiration. The trend shows no sign of slowing, especially as the quote continues to find relevance in new areas (from video game fitness subreddits to pandemic health advice posts about strengthening one’s body). It has firmly planted itself in the modern lexicon of motivational quotes, right up there with classics like “Pain is weakness leaving the body.” Only this one, as always, comes with the gritty twist of reminding you that at the end of the day, strength could save your life – literally or figuratively.

Sources:

  1. Rippetoe, Mark. “Strong Enough?” CrossFit Journal, Issue 61, Sept. 2007. Quote: “Strong people are harder to kill than weak people, and more useful in general.” 
  2. Pranklin, Keith. “Be More Useful?” StartingStrength.com, Nov. 24, 2021. (Opening with Rippetoe’s quote and discussing the value of strength) 
  3. Strength & Scotch Podcast (Episode 225). “Getting Strong is Simple w/ Mark Rippetoe.” (Show notes discussing the origin of Rippetoe’s quote in a CrossFit Journal article) 
  4. Free Beacon – Stiles, Andrew. “Trump Makes Army Ads Great Again…” Feb. 10, 2025. (Describing new Army ads with taglines like “Stronger people are harder to kill.”) 
  5. PubMed – Ruiz et al. (2008). “Association between muscular strength and mortality in men.” BMJ, 337(a439). (Conclusion that higher muscular strength is associated with lower mortality) 
  6. Generation Strong (Fitness Apparel). “Stronger People Are Harder To Kill” – Limited Edition Tee description. (Tribute to coach Charles Poliquin) 
  7. Urbana Daily Digital (Ohio). “The Story of Bruce Trout: Harder to Kill,” May 8, 2025. (Profile of a strength coach whose physical strength helped him survive a catastrophic accident) 
  8. Reddit r/Fitness. Discussion thread titled “Strong people are harder to kill…” (Linking a study on strength and mortality) .

Why most people are ignorant of health

OK some big thoughts:

First, it seems that like people are almost like universally wrong or foolish when it comes to health physiology etc.

First, almost everyone is in extremely poor health. Even Healthy Fit people are not. A lot of people who do yoga, are chronically stressed, not happy. People who do CrossFit are like constantly plagued with injuries.

Also weightlifters… Most of the bodybuilders are on steroids, and also injured, or on some sort of strange supplement deck. Seems par lifters are all universally on steroids, all the strong men are on steroids. Your favorite marvel superhero or X-Men is on steroids.

As a consequence, ain’t nobody to know anything about health. Not yet. Even most people don’t even know the word physiology.

I think we need to bring deep criticality to the world of health.

I’ll give you an example everything on ChatGPT the web, modern day science of health is wrong. And we are at a certain inflection point in which the misinformation feeds the misinformation, and as a consequence, it continues to stay wrong forever. I am actually a little bit concerned about the next generation, even using ChatGPT and deep research, once again all the information it gives me is like perpetually wrong.

The reason why this is concerning is that most children are just spoonfed the same information and knowledge, without any deep critical inquiry. My next generation of students, my vision is that it will have to deal with deep criticality, as well as ruthless trial and error, first principles thinking, obeying your body, and pain.

Who are the teachers

I’ll give you an example… All of your favorite physical trainers, they are also fools. None of them know anything.

Also funny enough… A lot of these fitness trainers and nerds, the biggest issue here is that actually, most of them are actually not that fit. Even in CrossFit I found that a lot of the trainers, are not that fit, and should be told I’ve never really met a CrossFitter who looks that fit?

Another example, Greg Glassman, the skinny fat loser who apparently studied every single exercise handbook on the planet yet never lifted a single barbell, apparently created this whole new exercise paradigm, yet I don’t think he actually does it? 

No this is problematic because it’s like having a 40-year-old virgin, watch every single intercourse video on the internet, yet never having actually done it… Teaching like a sexual workshop?  even worse, creating a global affiliate based network, promoting his methods?

Anyways, whatever. Just ignore all of the fools and creature your own path.

IT IS OFFICIAL AND I AM GOD, I JUST LIFTED 561KG, PRETTY EASY. GOING UP. RACK PULL.

I AM GOD: 561KG (1,237 LBS) RACK PULL LIFT: ERIC KIM GLOBAL DOMINATION.

1,236.79 lb