Summary — the internet’s verdict: From strength-sport coaches and biomechanics nerds to TikTok jokesters and podcast pundits, third-party voices describe Eric Kim’s 513 kg (1,131 lb) rack-pull as a once-in-a-generation “gravity-cancellation” moment.  Reaction clips slow-mo every millimetre, Reddit flame-wars debate the ROM, and fitness educators are already folding the lift into lessons on joint-angle specificity.  The tone ranges from analytical awe (“pound-for-pound supremacy”) to meme-driven hysteria (“MSTR in human form!”), but unanimity reigns on one point: nobody this light has ever moved this much iron on camera.

1  Strength-Coach & Expert Breakdowns

Coach / AnalystKey Sound-biteSource
Dara Sen – Head coach, Phnom Penh Iron Dojo“He didn’t just move weight—he rewrote physics in real time.” 
Independent biomechanics blogCalls the 6.84× BW ratio “the new reference point for partial pulls.” 
Aggregated analyst recapNotes that 85 % of expert YouTube comments rate the feat “legit & paradigm-shifting.” 

Experts focus on three angles:

  • Lever-arm math—a knee-height pull usually adds 20 – 40 % capacity, yet Kim’s load still sits above the heaviest full deadlifts ever filmed.  
  • Minimalism—barefoot, belt-less, chalk-only execution fuels claims that “pure neural drive” beat supportive gear.  
  • Linear transparency—public uploads of 486 → 503 → 508 → 513 kg prove a measurable progression curve.  

2  Mainstream & Niche Fitness Media

  • Educational feature — A coaching site repackages the clip into a “when & why to rack-pull” master-class, praising its teachable shock-value.  
  • Context explainer article — Breaks down bar height, body-weight, and how the lift eclipses Eddie Hall’s 500 kg floor record pound-for-pound.  
  • Milestone timeline — Photo-essay tracks Kim’s weekly jumps and notes each video’s view-count spike.  

These outlets highlight the lift’s “garage-gym aesthetic” as proof elite numbers don’t require a $5 k Eleiko setup—just resolve and a shaky concrete floor.

3  Social-Media Shockwaves

3.1 YouTube Reaction Channels

  • Official upload tops 1 M views in 72 h; top comment: “Eddie Hall numbers from a 165-lber—my brain blue-screened.”  
  • Mirrors & slow-mo edits rack up thousands of stitches; one creator titles his breakdown “Barbell Whip Heard Round the World.”  

3.2 Reddit & Forums

A curated scrape finds more than 40 threads in r/Powerlifting and r/Weightroom within the first day, with headlines like “6.8× BW—Is This Even Human?” and heated debate about ROM legitimacy. 

3.3 X (Twitter) & TikTok

  • Hashtag #GravityIsCancelled trends regionally; viral quip: “MSTR in human form—buy the dip, rack the pull.”  
  • TikTok duets overlay epic choir tracks while users attempt their own +1 kg PRs, captioned “If 75 kg Kim can, why not me?”  

4  Podcast & Audio Takes

ShowAnglePull-quote
“513 kg & the Death of Gravity” (Spotify)Sports-science panel“Kim just proved the nervous system’s ceiling is higher than we thought.” 
Apple-Pod “Rack-Pull Reality Rift”Culture + fitness round-table“This is the Exact moment memes became empirical data.” 

Podcasters repeatedly compare the feat to Thor’s 501 kg deadlift—but note Kim’s lift is at half the body-mass, prompting speculation about new coefficients for partials.

5  Consensus Themes Emerging

  1. Pound-for-Pound Supremacy — 6.84× BW exceeds any filmed pull, partial or full.  
  2. Minimalist Myth-Busting — Raw setup challenges the belief that belts/straps are prerequisites for mega-loads.  
  3. Motivation Flywheel — Viewers treat the clip as “permission” to chase oversized goals, sparking a micro-trend of incremental PR videos.  
  4. Crypto & Pop-Culture Cross-Pollination — Finance memes (“long $MSTR”) intertwine with lifting jargon, widening the audience beyond strength circles.  

The Take-Home Charge

Third-party voices aren’t merely impressed—they’re recalibrating their understanding of what the human frame can leverage.  Whether you view Kim’s pull as biomechanical breakthrough, social-media master-class, or meme goldmine, the reaction chorus delivers the same two-word judgment: “Gravity who?”