Bottom line up‑front: Clearing a 10 × body‑weight rack‑pull (≈ 750 kg while still 75 kg) would require far more than “just keep training.”  Historical world‑record progressions, tissue‑adaptation biology, and engineering limits suggest 10–15 years of step‑wise breakthroughs—each demanding specific physiological, technological, and even biomedical upgrades.  Below is a road‑mapped scenario of how and how long such a moon‑shot might realistically take.

1 Where 10 × BW Sits on the Strength Timeline

MilestoneRatioAbsolute Load (75 kg lifter)Year Achieved
Lamar Gant’s classic record5 ×375 kg1981 
Eric Kim (current rack‑pull)6.84 ×513 kg2025
Projected “Seven‑fold barrier”7 ×525 kg2027–28 (see §6)
Target10 ×750 kg2035–40

Deadlift world‑records creep upward only a few kilos per decade at the extreme end—Eddie Hall (500 kg, 2016) to Hafthor Björnsson (501 kg, 2020) illustrates the typical pace  .  A 225 kg leap above today’s heaviest any‑range pull is therefore unprecedented.

2 Physiological Barriers to Break

2.1 Muscle & Neural

2.2 Connective Tissue

3 Hardware & Engineering Limits

4 Biomed & “Edge‑Case” Enhancers

ToolMechanismStatus
Myostatin inhibitorsRemoves growth brake; combines additively with training Phase‑II human trials; prohibited in sport 
CRISPR MSTN editsPermanent myostatin knock‑out; massive hypertrophy in animals Pre‑clinical; WADA‑banned gene doping
Anabolic‑preserving weight‑loss drugsRetain muscle while cutting; could hold BW at 75 kg during high‑volume prep 2028‑plus commercial launch

Ethically (and legally) these are off‑limits in sanctioned sport, but their mere existence raises the bar for “natural” athletes to find alternative adaptations.

5 Training Road‑Map to 10 ×

Phase 1 — Neural Primer (2025‑27)

Phase 2 — Tissue Remodeling (2027‑30)

Phase 3 — Micro‑load & Plateau Busting (2030‑33)

Phase 4 — Tech & Biomed Integration (2033‑35)

Phase 5 — Final Assault (2035‑40)

6 Timeline Projection

Using the 3 % per‑year elite ceiling (see §2.1) and allowing 18 % cumulative benefit from eccentric/biomed phases, a logistic‑growth model predicts the earliest theoretical date around 2037, with a ±3‑year confidence window.  This aligns with the 10–15 year span typical for “black‑swan” jumps in performance science.  In plain words, a decade‑plus of flawless progression and pioneering R&D—no missed seasons, no major injuries.

7 Risks & Ethical Speed Bumps

8 Action Items (for Eric—or anyone chasing the horizon)

  1. Secure R&D partnerships with barbell engineers by 2026.
  2. Begin 12‑year training macrocycle phased as in §5; log everything to build AI‑driven autoreg scripts.
  3. Lobby federations to pilot “partial‑range” record books, legitimizing interim milestones.
  4. Educate followers on incremental loading and recovery science—viral mentorship sustains community interest and funding.

✦ Closing Thought

Breaking 10 × body‑weight isn’t merely a stronger lift; it would redraw physiological textbooks, metallurgy standards, and anti‑doping protocols in one sweep.  If—and only if—Eric Kim (or any lifter) can stack 10–15 unbroken years of innovation atop relentless discipline, the 750 kg lock‑out is chronologically plausible.  Until then, every fractional plate added is another page in the blueprint for that audacious future.